So did Dodge.Chevy had a desiel in the late 70's in a pick up.
Or Direct Injection, turbo charged, electronic fuel injection, able to get out of it's own way...Maybe they mean modern, as in the 21st century.
Nick
Hahah if people based there opinions of "modern" diesels off 6. 2/6. 5's that could explain a lot!
People did for a long time.
GM set Diesel powered public acceptance back a good 30 years when they put the POS Junk 5. 7 Diesel engine and it's variants on the market. I know 'cause I had one.
All of the good diesels offered by other makers were overshadowed by GM's dismal cheapskate converted gas engines. I still hate them for it to this day.
Mike.
People did for a long time.
GM set Diesel powered public acceptance back a good 30 years when they put the POS Junk 5. 7 Diesel engine and it's variants on the market. I know 'cause I had one.
All of the good diesels offered by other makers were overshadowed by GM's dismal cheapskate converted gas engines. I still hate them for it to this day.
Mike.
I had one too, in an Olds wagon. It lost a piston at 4300 miles. The inside of the short block was so sloppily machined you would have to wear gloves when working on it, lest you end up in the ER. I was considering a '95 Blazer with the 6. 5TD, but just wasn't sold on the engine and its layout. Went with the Dodge instead, and that was a good choice, espescially on resale value. A Blazer of that era with a blown engine would be a good candidate for a 4BT conversion, as it's already titled as a diesel.
I also had the occasion to drive a Chevy of that era that had been repowered with the Mitsubishi that Dodge had offered, and even with an aftermarket turbo setup (which was crude by today's standards), it was still a dog. I would also imagine that there's no parts support for that engine whatsoever.
The best 1/2 ton diesel I ever had was a '77 2WD Blazer that I repowered with an EPA certified 5-cylinder Deutz engine. The engine, transmission, bell housing, Webasto heater and other parts were $7700 in 1981- a real piece of change back then. Highway FE at a steady 55 MPH was 33 MPG. As Rolls-Royce once claimed, power was "adequate".
the big question is this: Does VM's 3L have some of the same goofy engineering characteristics as the 2. 8 I4 that's in my daughter's Jeep Liberty? For instance, the turbo's central bearing's oil drain doesn't just drop into the oil pan. It goes from pump to filter to central bearing to crankshaft, and THEN drops into the pan. That just seems like they're just begging for low-flow on the turbo's bearing, and then damage to the crank if something bad happens upstream. Other than goofiness like that, it's pretty lovable. ... . and, currently stationary, due to a currently-uninvestigated turbo issue. . hmmmm... .