Knocking the 24 valver basically due to it's (comparative) MODERATE use of computerized engine controls is shortsighted, foolish, and totally IGNORES the fact that while those controls DO provide a measure of upgraded emission controls, they ALSO, and PRIMARILY provide a much more reliable, efficient and POWERFUL engine! PLUS the fact that such controls provide a faster, easier and less expensive route to reasonable additional engine power and efficiency!
The mere fact the emissions improvement is PART of that package is HARDLY reason to trash the whole parcel - especially when MOST of you are also quite happily driving various smaller family vehicles that are FAR more "computerized" and EPA controlled - and you're probably QUITE content with THEM!
Cussing the 24 valve because of lift pump problems is very much like cussing the 12 valvers because the older ones overheated, had bad brakes, blew headgaskets, had defective AT cooling line connectors, suffered from the notorious "death wobble", commonly cracked around the injector plugs and exhaust valves, frequently cracked exhaust manifolds - or had bad 5 speed trannies and auto trannies...
Or have some conveniently forgotten all those... ? Don't confuse - or confuse others over the difference between ENGINES and PERIPHERALS!
I think poor common sense and lack of balanced reason has blinded some here to the realities of past problems, weaknesses and outright failures in the 12 valve engines... Yeah - they are GOOD overall, but PERFECT - or even "More perfect" than the 24 valve? I think NOT - and *I* dern sure DON'T need guys over in the FORD group to tell ME which Cummins is "best" for me. .

NOR do I think it logical or mature to knock technology simply because it *IS* technology - it's not ALL bad!
As far as "getting left along the road" is concerned - it REALLY doesn't make much difference if *I* get left there due to a failed lift pump in a 24 valver - OR a "Killer dowel pin" in a 12 valver - it's STILL a long walk EITHER way, and BOTH are the direct result of failures in engineering design, and these and similar failures and weaknesses are relatively common to all makes and engine types - the 12 valvers are NO exception!
I'll certainly agree that computerized control ONLY or PRIMARILY for emissions purposes is likely something to avoid - but to blithely suggest that is the case with current 24 valve engine, and avoid them mainly for that reason, simply places you squarely back in the dark ages of engine technology!

And it is CERTAINLY not accurate as far as these engines are concerned - tho I fear it MAY be true of the NEXT generation of Cummins used in these trucks, which is why I bought the one I now have...
