I've been looking at wheel options for my SRW 3500 for a couple years now, but now that I have a 5th wheel, I think I need to make a decision. I'm not pulling very heavy (about 1500# pin weight), but coming down a couple passes here in Utah, I could really feel how squirrly (sp?) the stock BFG Rugged Trails are, especially in the corners.
So the other day I was in a local Les Schwab store talking to the manager about prices on the Vision type 81 wheels. He told me that if I was to go to a 20" wheel and the Toyo Open Country MT in a 275/65r20 that my ride would be much better than with the 19. 5 Visions. He claimed that the Toyo MT is the strongest carcass tire on the market, with a "E" load rating. So I asked about the Toyo AT's and he claimed they were not built as well as the MT's. He also claimed that he would be able to make me a much better deal on the LT tires and rims, because he doesn't have very much room to deal on the 19. 5 stuff.
Now, I'm not a big fan of mud type tires. I don't like the road noise and I've never seen a set get very good milage out of them. So I'm torn. I had almost decided to go with the Vision 81's and Michelin XDE2+'s in a 265/70r19. 5. The overall size of each of these tires are pretty similar. About 34" tall x 10. 4-11" wide. What are the real world milages I can expect out of these two tires? 30k on the MT's vs. 75k on the Michelins? I don't know!
My questions are 1) is what he's saying about the Toyo AT's and MT's true? and 2) if the AT's are not as well made as the MT's, which way would the TDR crowd go? and 3) how much better of a ride would the 20" wheels provide?
Thanks for the help guys.
So the other day I was in a local Les Schwab store talking to the manager about prices on the Vision type 81 wheels. He told me that if I was to go to a 20" wheel and the Toyo Open Country MT in a 275/65r20 that my ride would be much better than with the 19. 5 Visions. He claimed that the Toyo MT is the strongest carcass tire on the market, with a "E" load rating. So I asked about the Toyo AT's and he claimed they were not built as well as the MT's. He also claimed that he would be able to make me a much better deal on the LT tires and rims, because he doesn't have very much room to deal on the 19. 5 stuff.
Now, I'm not a big fan of mud type tires. I don't like the road noise and I've never seen a set get very good milage out of them. So I'm torn. I had almost decided to go with the Vision 81's and Michelin XDE2+'s in a 265/70r19. 5. The overall size of each of these tires are pretty similar. About 34" tall x 10. 4-11" wide. What are the real world milages I can expect out of these two tires? 30k on the MT's vs. 75k on the Michelins? I don't know!
My questions are 1) is what he's saying about the Toyo AT's and MT's true? and 2) if the AT's are not as well made as the MT's, which way would the TDR crowd go? and 3) how much better of a ride would the 20" wheels provide?
Thanks for the help guys.