It has nothing to do with lack of oxygen - it's the lack of logical thinking and the absolute physical impossibility of both a 2-3 "bind up" shift and a 1-2-1-3 shift sequence.
If you have a 1-2-1-3 shift sequence, you cannot have 2-3 "bind up" - if you have 2-3 "bind up", you cannot have a 1-2-1-3 shift!
Explain to all of us EXACTLY how you can have a 2-3 bind up AND a 1-2-1-3 shift sequence... . So, which one is it? You can’t have both, but some would lead you to believe that you can.
So, now I'm to believe that I have both a 1-2-1-3 shift sequence, and a 2-3 "bind up"? Now it becomes a 1-2-1-2-bind up-3 shift sequence I guess... And where on earth does the governor come into play here? That was the original claim of DTT – a device touching the governor circuit CAUSES this 2-3 "bind up" – a “bind up” which according to Bill was put there in the first place by the factory for “drivability” - in which case, if the bind up is already there from the factory, how can it be stated that something else (like the Emjay) is, or can, cause it? According to Bill, IT'S ALREADY THERE!!!
So given the claims that Bill is making, my 2002 DC has:
- A 1-2-1-3 shift sequence.
- A 2-3 bind up with the Emjay Strategy (because it modifies the governors excitation voltage)
- A Manufacturer “feature” for drivability of a 2-3 bind up shift
None of which I, nor any of my DC friends have found to be true. Will this kind of rhetoric ever end?
Also, I'm still waiting for a response to my post from a month ago... Where, other than DTT (i. e. DC Manual) is it stated the proper procedure for using a gauge for detecting any 2-3 bind up (either "factory supplied" or Emjay)? What are we to be looking for on that gauge? According to the local Dodge dealers and their transmission techs, there is no such procedure, because you could not detect this supposed "bind up" with any kind of pressure gauge. If this "bind up" did happen, the TCM would throw a code and you would go into limp mode immediately.
-joel