MMeier said:
So Jason, am I going to have problems when I put my Con FE in with the replacement transmission ??
I'm told it's the added weight on the FE clutch disc vs. the weight of hte stock disc. The stocker is lighter, thus allowing the synco so slow the clutch disc down fast enought for fast shifts. . It works fine if you give things an extra 1 count, But in a 1/4 mile race, that 1 counts are going to lose some ET's big time.
Things are starting to get a little better, I installed the heavy duty master/slave to make sure the pressure plate was fully releasing the clutch disc.
I have 550miles or so on this new ConFE and it holds just perfect. The grabby nees is easyly managed once your used to it.
But I have NOT been able to grab 3rd, 4th or 5th with any decent rate of speed when I wanna move fast, I can always grab 6th in a flash like I always did with the old clutch.
As the guys said before, The auto's are faster then the manuals. Yep, at this point in my experience I'll have to take back what I said about htat being wrong when it comes to a SBC ConFE as your clutch, With the stocker clutch and same fly wheel HP, No auto will come close to me driving my manual. But when I have to add almost 2 full seconds of time for shifting durning a 1/4 mile cuz the trans can't sync up quick enough. What's the point?
Maybe something with the same weight clutch disc + a pressure plate near 4000#'s would provide the necessay holding power and fast shifting (so long as you can press that clutch in fast enough) and row the gears quickly and sustaning 600hp at the wheels. who knows.
Maybe I need more time to break in things and re-train the transmission's synco's.
Then again, how likly could a new piolot barring, in the plastic package the enire time be bad? Would the Heavy duty one be better for this case? (dispite the need to machine the flywheel)?