I have never liked the Dodge parking brake from day-one. The goofy ratchet design that returns the pedal to the up position even when the brake was applied eliminated any "visual verification" of engagement. That meant total reliance on the "Brake" light, which was useless if the ignition was off, so I would find myself constantly re-pushing the pedal. Hard. So did everyone who ever drove my truck. That probably lead to some unnecessary wear and stress.
When mine began to "pop-off" by itself occassionally, I knew it was time for a change.
I can not believe how overly-complex Dodge designed such a simple decades-old mechanism! No wonder it has reliability issues. Way too many moving parts!
I wish I could describe better how I did it, but a simplification is that I welded the pedal arm to the ratchet cam and increased and reversed the spring tension which also increased the tooth engagement pressure. The spring now acts as a pedal return as well as a release. My pedal stays down when the brake is applied and it holds positively. Then it comes back up when released. I can actually LOOK and SEE it is engaged. Just like a normal truck.
Much of the poor design stems from Dodge being obsessed with using that flat-copper-contact brake light switch instead of just a simple, reliable plunger-type switch, then relying on a careful and too-delicate balance of spring pressure to keep the teeth (kinda-sorta-hopefully) engaged. The "pedal-always-in-up-position" ratchet mechanism is the rest of the nightmare.
No wonder these trucks cost so much! When manufacturers go to such extremes to build an overly complicated and less effective "mouse trap" to replace something as simple as a parking brake, it has to cost a fortune in design work and to manufacture all of the extra unnecessary parts.
Now that it is getting colder, I will be needing a reliable parking brake so I can let my engine run and warm up sometimes while parked.
Has there already been a better solution found to this problem? I just went with my own approach. Maybe no one else has had parking brake woes? I'm curious about that, too.
When mine began to "pop-off" by itself occassionally, I knew it was time for a change.
I can not believe how overly-complex Dodge designed such a simple decades-old mechanism! No wonder it has reliability issues. Way too many moving parts!
I wish I could describe better how I did it, but a simplification is that I welded the pedal arm to the ratchet cam and increased and reversed the spring tension which also increased the tooth engagement pressure. The spring now acts as a pedal return as well as a release. My pedal stays down when the brake is applied and it holds positively. Then it comes back up when released. I can actually LOOK and SEE it is engaged. Just like a normal truck.
Much of the poor design stems from Dodge being obsessed with using that flat-copper-contact brake light switch instead of just a simple, reliable plunger-type switch, then relying on a careful and too-delicate balance of spring pressure to keep the teeth (kinda-sorta-hopefully) engaged. The "pedal-always-in-up-position" ratchet mechanism is the rest of the nightmare.
No wonder these trucks cost so much! When manufacturers go to such extremes to build an overly complicated and less effective "mouse trap" to replace something as simple as a parking brake, it has to cost a fortune in design work and to manufacture all of the extra unnecessary parts.
Now that it is getting colder, I will be needing a reliable parking brake so I can let my engine run and warm up sometimes while parked.
Has there already been a better solution found to this problem? I just went with my own approach. Maybe no one else has had parking brake woes? I'm curious about that, too.
Last edited: