Jason, I think you worded this a little wrong:
" The ones that complain about taking emissions equipment off to "save the children" or "save the environment" via non-smoking trucks. "
Nobody removes emissions to save env/kids.....
No one has stated here that chips are bad. I have simply stated I was not going to chip my truck till some time passed to give chip makers a chance to prove their products. I stated I would not touch one before being proved.
And yes I am a CEO of a land development Corporation.
Economics or staying in business was never part of this discussion or what was the cheap way to travel.
It was about Jason #1 asking who made chips for 6. 7Ls.
Thanks
CUMMINZ
Yes, I did word that wrong. Thank you for catching that.
The Economics I'm referring to is to "roll with the punches or you lose". Hence the after market companies having to make these products to upset the government in order to make a living, even if it is a program to allow the removal of the exhaust system(s). Yes, massive legal waivers are needed to CYA. I was referring to you about your comment in post #8.
In a nut shell, whom spits at the idea of removing emissions equipment and then pulls a large trailer for "vacations" needs to have their head checked.