Last edited by a moderator:
DValentine said:Joe, not ignoring you. I just haven't heard of the rod. There is a lot out their that I don't know about. Is it a mild steel rod or an alloy rod?
I just haven't heard of it.
Dave
nickleinonen said:i haven't heard of that rod either, but googling it came up with this
UTP 612 * An all position mild steel coated electrode for arc welding. Operates on AC or DC current and can be welded by even the most inexperienced welder. 72,000 psi tensile strength and moisture resistant.
sounds like a more user friendly 7018???
Joe G. said:I found out about it from a pro I talked to at the welding supply over 20 years ago. He said it worked very well with a buzz box and would make a good welder out of me. What prompted my question on this thread was to find out if some of the rod you guys are using is even better. It is easy to use. I can hold a very close arc without it sticking and get good penetration.
Joe G. said:I've used UTP612 for years with my buzz box. That was the advice I got from a pro when I was at the welding shop to get some stuff. I don't weld that much, but when I do I do a pretty good job with this stuff. Do you more experienced guys have any opinion about UTP612?
rbattelle said:Got some good learnin' in the last hour or so. I was complaining before about the arc going out mid-weld with the 7018. I think I know what the problem was - speed. I was going too slow. I've found it's important to move along with the 7018, no sittin' around in the weld puddle pickin' your nose! The slag is totally different than 60-series rods. Part of the difference, I think, is that it's much harder and cools much faster than the 60-series do. So if you hang around in the puddle for a long time the slag builds up quickly which hurts conductivity. If you keep moving, there's no problem.
Another thing I notice about the 7018s is that for me it's easy to confuse the slag pool with the filler metal pool under through the welding lens. I find myself sometimes mistakenly focusing on the slag pool and thinking I'm making a mess of things when in reality I'm doing just fine. It's hard to describe, but the 7018 slag cools quick, and it darkens when it cools. It will cool (and darken) rapidly after the puddle has past, and the color change from light to dark makes it look like you've got molten metal flowing like water along your weld bead. This doesn't actually happen, though, it's just your eyes playing tricks on you.
Below are 3 photos. The first one shows my first attempt to run a simulated tee-joint on an old piece of tee-shaped fence post. This is what happens when you guess way high on the current setting - I guessed 80 amp for 0. 175" thick metal. WAY too hot; burned right through.
The second one shows my first 7018 run of the day at 75 amp (still too hot, but not burn-through hot) versus my second run of the day at 65 amp (seems to be just about right for this metal).
The third photo shows a comparison between a run I made with 6013 versus my 3rd run of the day with the 7018 rod at 65 amp. I think the superiority of the 7018 is clear here. I did have better luck avoiding slag inclusions in the 6013 (as you can see) by following the "drag" advice. I have trouble getting both pieces of the joint to contribute to the puddle with 6013 - seems like the bead ends up on one piece or the other, but not both.
Have I mentioned how much I love this?
-Ryan
One reason I take every weld so serious, you are litterly trading some of your eye sight to complete that weld
Coalsmoke said:never heard of it, but I would bet a fair sum that if you analyzed it, you'd find it isn't much different that your run-of-the-mill rutile-based 7014. When you run it, you will probably find that it has a thick slag as oppsed to a thinner harder slag that you'd find with 6010/6011 right?
Coalsmoke said:Don't bother buying a cheap auto hood, it will make life miserable for you.