Just finished reading my new issue of TDR. Read the article on the crack problem with block "53". well just like everybody with 98. 5, I ran out look up and there it was "53". So not to worried as I have not "enhanced" the power, I don't pull anything, and drive with a lite foot, for the mileage.
So just to give me a warm fuzzy feeling, can anybody out there answer the following:
1. How many "53" blocks were produced?
2. How many have cracked?
3. Of thoses that have failed how many were "enhanced"?
4. What was the average mileage on the odometer at failure?
5. Is the crack in the water jacket only, or does it go stright through to the cylinder?
The article also mentions that Cummins is aware of the problem. Have they made any public or other wise, comment on the issue?
I now have 151K on the odometer, with out a lick of trouble, with the engine. Just one lift pump at 135K. Not bad.
I truly love my 5. 9 Turbo Diesel and will not trade it because of this issue. I intend to put a least 500K on it before I ever think of any change.
Well thanks for letting me get that off my chest.
So just to give me a warm fuzzy feeling, can anybody out there answer the following:
1. How many "53" blocks were produced?
2. How many have cracked?
3. Of thoses that have failed how many were "enhanced"?
4. What was the average mileage on the odometer at failure?
5. Is the crack in the water jacket only, or does it go stright through to the cylinder?
The article also mentions that Cummins is aware of the problem. Have they made any public or other wise, comment on the issue?
I now have 151K on the odometer, with out a lick of trouble, with the engine. Just one lift pump at 135K. Not bad.
I truly love my 5. 9 Turbo Diesel and will not trade it because of this issue. I intend to put a least 500K on it before I ever think of any change.
Well thanks for letting me get that off my chest.