--Joe, I can't believe you keep playing with those dyno things.
The real test is out on the road, loaded,uphill, pulling away!--
Dyno testing is reproducible and gives good data. The scope and limitations of the experiment and the data need to be evaluated. Knowledge of experimental design and data interpretation help. Twenty or thirty years of conducting scientific experiments helps. Driving a pole truck doesn't give the ability to do this. Experience selling oil doesn't do it, either. Kevin Dinwiddie has education and training, along with certifications, so he is qualified to speak. I value his judgments, and he tries not to "sell" his oil. He presents test results that show how his stuff performs. In the case of the NV4500, he honestly states that LE607 (and other lubes in the correct viscosity and additive range) would work, but advises us to stay with the Castrol because it is the best lube for the transmission.
It's natural to be suspicious of tests you can't understand. Yes, pulling a load is the ultimate test, but it is very difficult to reproduce experimental conditions. It is also difficult to accumulate accurate data. You need to monitor transmission temperature vs. load vs. time. Fuel mileage would be an indicator of drag, but it is too imprecise as there are too many other variables. It is also difficult to see short-term the effects of long-term use of other lubes, because temperature, humidity, and other variables are difficult to control. Even when failure occurs, there are so many contributors that it is difficult to assign the "blame". Hence, scientific testing is used to isolate variables and test them.
The limited tests I performed showed that only Torco RTF, of the lubes I had available for testing, came close to Castrol Syntorq in horsepower drag. Drag or friction is one of the properties that relates to the performance of Syntorq and other lubes in the NV4500. Transmission temperature is another. On-the-road testing showed that transmission lube temperature was similar to that of Syntorq. Shift quality was good. However, what about high temperatures and humidity, conditions that contribute to breakdown of the lubricant? For my use, in low humidity areas, RTF would work. I expect that some other lubes would, too. Under extreme conditions of load, temperature, and humidity, I don't know. As Kevin said, the GL6 additives of the RTF would probably be a bit better for gear tooth protection. Syntorq would be better for the synchronizers.
There are a number of honest, polite oil salesmen on this forum. Many of them use and sell Amsoil. That is fine with me. Each customer should pick the lubricants he/she wants to use.