Chevy and Chrysler banned from NASCAR (non Political)

Attention: TDR Forum Junkies
To the point: Click this link and check out the Front Page News story(ies) where we are tracking the introduction of the 2025 Ram HD trucks.

Thanks, TDR Staff

Guns, Bows, Shooting Sports, and Hunting M1 socom

OK I can see this getting Political, that's why there is a thread on it in the Political Forum. The reason I post this here is to have a conversation with NASCAR fans about how Chevy and Dodge not being in NSACAR will effect the sport. This is a conversation about NASCAR and not politics PLEASE!



I for one think it will be devistating for the sport. Lots of fans gone, lots of sponsors gone, lots of everything, gone! I may watch here and there, but can't say for sure. Think about how many favorite drivers will be gone!



The article is below... .



Obama Orders Chevrolet and Dodge Out Of NASCAR - Car News



With their racing budgets deemed “unnecessary expenditures,” GM and Chrysler are ordered to cease racing operations at the end of the season.



BY JARED GALL, ILLUSTRATION BY ERIC WOODWARD

April 2009







In a move sure to spark outrage, the White House announced today that GM and Chrysler must cease participation in NASCAR at the end of the 2009 season if they hope to receive any additional financial aid from the government. Companies around the globe—Honda and Audi, to name two—have drawn down racing operations, and NASCAR itself has already felt the pinch in the form of reduced team spending. A complete withdrawal from America’s premier racing series is expected to save more than $250 million between GM and Chrysler, a substantial amount considering the drastic measures being implemented elsewhere.



“Automakers used to operate on the principle of ‘win on Sunday, sell on Monday,’ but the Auto Task Force’s research just doesn’t validate that as true,” said the statement from President Obama. While fans have decried the Car of Tomorrow for heavily limiting what little personalization the cookie-cutter series had previously allowed to participating manufacturers, and drivers have slammed its brick-like aerodynamics and unpredictable handling, even the governmental oversight committee sees that the full-scale regulation of the cars leaves the manufacturers very little space for research and development. “NASCAR is a racing series that regulates down to the smallest detail of the cars, where a car badged a Chevrolet or Dodge differs only marginally from a Ford or a Toyota. There’s no technological development to speak of. ”



The statement goes on further to say the same demand will be made of Ford if it asks for government assistance. “In order to receive this money, corporations must demonstrate they will spend it wisely. Racing has been said to improve on-road technology, but frankly, NASCAR almost flaunts its standing among the lowest-tech forms of motorsport. NASCAR is not proven to drive advancements that transfer from the racetrack to the road, and this nation’s way forward does not hinge on decades-old technology. We need new, and we need innovation. ”



The President realizes this will be an unpopular call, but stands behind the decision, saying, “This is an obvious cut to make, but it is not an easy one. This administration is not ignoring the tremendous sentimental value and emotional appeal NASCAR holds for so many Americans. But now is not the time for sentiment and nostalgia; now is a time for decisive financial action. If our automotive industry is to emerge from this recession intact, then these difficult decisions must be made. ”



Both Chevrolet and Dodge see the move as only temporary, and fully expect to resume racing in NASCAR as soon as they have stabilized and the government’s hand in their operations is minimized. “There is nothing really to say at this point,” said one representative, who wished to remain anonymous. “We’ve been doing this since the beginning, and we always assumed we’d be doing this until the end. Heck, nobody ever thought to think that there would be an end. But we ain’t done. As soon as this is over, we’re taking back our spot at the top. ”



NASCAR officials remain tight-lipped about the call, but sources say series president Mike Helton and team managers are exploring several options, including other manufacturers to fill Chevrolet and Dodge’s vacated positions. Given the company’s recent interest in motorsport and the steady cash-flow and V-8 engine provided by its new Genesis sedan, sources indicate that NASCAR is pinging Hyundai to gauge the Korean company’s interest in occupying a spot in NASCAR. “Toyota was not well-received their first year in the sport, nor was their first season an easy one,” the source says. “But they learned, they applied the lessons, and they have proven very competitive this year. ”



If Hyundai does indeed join the series, there will no doubt be a steep learning curve, and the move would leave Ford the lone domestic battling a pair of Asian makes in America’s most popular racing series. We wonder, however, how long NASCAR could hold that title without two of its most storied participants.
 
As one who has watched NOCAR :) since first seeing it as a youngster on ABC's Wild world of Sports, It's MHO the sport has seen it's zenith and is on its way down. On another thread I've already made my point of view known. It (NOCAR) is nothing more than a glorified IROC series now. And that's a shame.
 
Ahh yes it is, its not even on Nascar.com's radar lol Pretty sure it'd be front page material there... . The sky is not falling.
 
“NASCAR is a racing series that regulates down to the smallest detail of the cars, where a car badged a Chevrolet or Dodge differs only marginally from a Ford or a Toyota. There’s no technological development to speak of. ”



That one sentence made the article believable and is the very reason I have no interest in NASCAR
 
That one sentence made the article believable and is the very reason I have no interest in NASCAR



EXACTLY! The days of these things being "stock" cars is LONG gone! Since when can you get a V-8, rear wheel drive Toyota Camry? Like so many "professional" sports, it is all about "rules" and "big money sponsors". Screw Nascar! I would rather watch the local boys drag a beater out of the briers, hop it up and trash it on the little local tracks.
 
EXACTLY! The days of these things being "stock" cars is LONG gone! Since when can you get a V-8, rear wheel drive Toyota Camry? Like so many "professional" sports, it is all about "rules" and "big money sponsors". Screw Nascar! I would rather watch the local boys drag a beater out of the briers, hop it up and trash it on the little local tracks.



That's how I feel about it too.
 
and that one sentence comes from someone who apparently knows very little about the sport...



I know that a crewchief was fined once for moving a mounting bolt 1/4 inch. If you think a bunch of clones going round and round a track is a sport you are exactly what NASCAR is all about.
 
There are very few technology advances in these things. They still run carburetors for crying out loud! And they ARE freaking clones. No difference in the powertrains, aerodynamics, bodies, nothing... . there is nothing "stock" about these hunks of fiberglass. In its early days, NASCAR was interesting... then it became an over hyped, over regulated big sponsor advertisement. Screw that. I will stick with watching the local drag races (with REAL cars/trucks) and the local tracks (again with REAL cars). "Indy" car racing is still pretty interesting, especially since the diesels are in it now!
 
There are very few technology advances in these things. They still run carburetors for crying out loud! And they ARE freaking clones. No difference in the powertrains, aerodynamics, bodies, nothing... . there is nothing "stock" about these hunks of fiberglass. In its early days, NASCAR was interesting... then it became an over hyped, over regulated big sponsor advertisement. Screw that. I will stick with watching the local drag races (with REAL cars/trucks) and the local tracks (again with REAL cars). "Indy" car racing is still pretty interesting, especially since the diesels are in it now!
Where's the fiberglass? You're only a few years older than me, and we weren't around for the 'early days of NASCAR'! If you think that there's no differences in any of the cars, how do some run better than others? You have to have rules... everything has rules, NASCAR has ALWAYS had rules!

and by your 'drag it out of the briars' comment... I'm guessin that you're a fan of demo derbies or something?

if you're not a fan, that's fine... but you're really showing a lack of knowledge in your posts
 
Last edited:
Where's the fiberglass? You're only a few years older than me, and we weren't around for the 'early days of NASCAR'! If you think that there's no differences in any of the cars, how do some run better than others? You have to have rules... everything has rules, NASCAR has ALWAYS had rules!



and by your 'drag it out of the briars' comment... I'm guessin that you're a fan of demo derbies or something?



if you're not a fan, that's fine... but you're really showing a lack of knowledge in your posts



You can take two "identical" engines and make "slight" adjustments to them and one will often run better than the other. Aren't the bodies and spoilers fiberglass or some kind of composite/plastic material? The ones I have seen on display sure appear fiberglass.

By the "early days" of NASCAR, I mean where it had to "start" as a production car: V-8, rear wheel drive... the days of the Ford Thunderbirds, Dodge Chargers, Chevrolet Impala, etc... (now the only production rear drive, V-8 one out there, right?) It began its great deterioration when the Taurus and Lumina grocery getters were now called "stock" cars in this race. From the factory, they are front drive V-6 family mobiles. I have always preferred drag racing because of a lot of action in a shorter amount of time, with less rules and over regulation on powertrain, engine specifications, aerodynamics, etc.

No comment on the fact that they still run out dated carburetors and that they have all the aerodynamics added the same on each, so much that they do not even LOOK like a "stock" car? They are damn clones!

I would have loved to have been able to witness the start of NASCAR, when it was the old moonshine cars... souped up production cars. I have no problem with the current races, but they are FAR from "stock" cars, unlike the little local races (drag, dirt track, asphalt oval). If they are going to call it "stock car" racing (Doesn't NASCAR stand for "national association of stock car auto racing"?), they should be required to start with a production car, otherwise call it something else and allow the "stock car" races to truly be such.
 
I watch NASCAR on a regular bais, because I r a redneck. Who thought that duck tape could tune a car? It's racing who cares it the cars are stock or not. Beside I hear they are changing the Nascar to the title to "National Association of Safe Car Auto Racing"

Look at all the Sled Pullers that grow out of there stock frame and stock body trucks. Guess somethings just get to the point that stock isn't cool.
 
Back
Top