I'm in the process of rebuilding a 1998.5 24 valve engine that I found in a salvage yard. It is a non-53 block with 289,000 miles that was running upon salvage. Upon tear down, I discovered no major indications of failure; just normal wear patterns. I am currently working with a machine shop in preparation for a stock rebuild.
Here are my questions: First, the Dodge service manual states that if you are going to machine the head that you remove 0.0098 inches (9.8 thousandths) from the deck. That seems excessive to me in the event that 4 or 5 thousandths (or less) might clean up the head. The Cummins manual makes no mentions of minimum machining removals. Has anyone confronted this issue?
Second issue up is the reason for piston grading. Cummins has A, B and C grade pistons that appear to differ only in height by 0.004 each. The A piston is the "shortest." Upon tear down, I discovered that my engine had B pistons in all cylinders except for number six, which was a C grade piston. Does Cummins use these piston to accommodate tolerances in the manufacturing process?
It would seem to me that if you were thinking of future machining to the block deck that you would install the "tallest" piston (C grade) in every cylinder and then use the shorter pistons to accommodate the piston protrusion specs. Anyone exposed to these issues in the Forum?
Third is the head gasket. Cummins only offers one gasket thickness for the 24 valve engines. I believe that the 12 valve models had a range of head gaskets. Why is this and what have people done to address the piston protrusion issues after machining.
I'll post pictures of the project in a few days. It has been an interesting project with lots "words of wisdom" to offer.
Thanks in advance.
Mark Young
Fair Oaks, CA
Here are my questions: First, the Dodge service manual states that if you are going to machine the head that you remove 0.0098 inches (9.8 thousandths) from the deck. That seems excessive to me in the event that 4 or 5 thousandths (or less) might clean up the head. The Cummins manual makes no mentions of minimum machining removals. Has anyone confronted this issue?
Second issue up is the reason for piston grading. Cummins has A, B and C grade pistons that appear to differ only in height by 0.004 each. The A piston is the "shortest." Upon tear down, I discovered that my engine had B pistons in all cylinders except for number six, which was a C grade piston. Does Cummins use these piston to accommodate tolerances in the manufacturing process?
It would seem to me that if you were thinking of future machining to the block deck that you would install the "tallest" piston (C grade) in every cylinder and then use the shorter pistons to accommodate the piston protrusion specs. Anyone exposed to these issues in the Forum?
Third is the head gasket. Cummins only offers one gasket thickness for the 24 valve engines. I believe that the 12 valve models had a range of head gaskets. Why is this and what have people done to address the piston protrusion issues after machining.
I'll post pictures of the project in a few days. It has been an interesting project with lots "words of wisdom" to offer.
Thanks in advance.
Mark Young
Fair Oaks, CA