Don,
There is a fairly long thread I started about using studs. There are several many differences to consider. I'll try to be brief.
The OEM LONG bolts and cover sleeve have a purpose to allow elastic bolt elongation as the manifold grows in thickness, then returns to correct length as manifold cools.
The cap bolts I got with the ATS would work themselves out. What started this thing was one day I was in the engine compartment generally checking and found one of the cap bolts laying on top of the manifold. Checked further and one from underneath was missing. Checked torque and none were holding torque.
I think others have tried safety wiring the cap bolts, using locktite, and maybe a couple of other approaches.
The key I think is the stud / bolt has to remain elastic so it can return to its origional shape, yet stretch when the manifold grows in thickness from the heat cycles. Bolt length, Inconels, ????, something that will stay elastic.
I tried studs with split washers first. Heat took the temper out of the split washers in about a month. Also I torqued the studs to 32# which is close to their elastic limit, then the temp growth pushes them into their plastic limit and they will not return to their origional length, ie will not hold torque.
Then I started the thread to figuer it out. RustyJC knows ALOT about elasticity of metals and I drew on his knowledge and calculations.
The ATS manifold will not allow LONG bolts within elastic limits due to larger passages and casting physical interference with long bolts. At the end of the thread I ended up with a new set of studs (others were into plastic limits) Inconel washers (which are slightly conical and designed to flatten with stress and return to conical as the stress is relieved and can take 2000*) Drake SS nuts & lock nuts so the nuts stay put. Problem is it took 3 Inconel washers per stud $8 @ washer, Drakes were about $8 @, studs $2 @, SS washers $2 @ stud. 12 studs = ~ $450 in washers, studs, nuts. I also used SS washers for the Inconel's to ride on as a replaceable bearing surface instead of directly on the ATS manifold. The torque was 16# on the Drake (10# on the Drake lock nut) so the studs would stay elastic.
The thread explains each twist and turn in detail. Without RustyJC's thermal expansion calculations it would have been impossible.
I have checked the torque twice in about 3 months and it is exactely 16# on every Drake nut and 10# on every Drake locknut. Everything seems to be elastic and expanding and contraction just fine.
It works very well, but pricey.
Do it again? I would use warrantee to replace the OEM manifold as long as I could, then check to see if ATS has a better way at that time. I still like the ATS manifold and would still highly recommend it. Maybe someone will come up with a better way.
I don't think many ATS manifold users have the problem. Not a lot of threads on it. I don't know what those of us that have the problem are doing differently. I don't know, just I had the problem and needed to fix it.
Bob Weis