2nd Gen Non-Engine/Transmission Front vs. rear wheeltrack width?

[SRath]

Now that I have my frontend all apart (still), and can't measure, the question has come up as to whether the front and rear wheel track is exactly the same or not on my '96? I tend to think the front track is a bit wider, but, if so, I don't know how much.



I'm considering a conversion that would add @1" width to my front axle and wonder if that will cause any problem? I have been told that many trucks come with slightly narrower rear wheeltrack widths to aid in cornering. I have never checked it out. As long as rubbing is not an issue, I can't see where an inch or so difference would hurt anything, but maybe I'm overlooking something?



And does anyone know if the Dynatrac or EMS hub kits maintain the stock width or if they add any width?



Scott

 

[David411]

Wondering the same thing, the hub kit I am looking at does the same thing.

 

[DCreed]

Adding an inch to the width will change steering geometry a bit and increase scrub radius and the jacking effect when turning.

 

[MustangDiesel004]

If you look at he '88 to'98 Chevrolets and GMC 3/4 and 1 Ton 4x4s they had a wider front wheel track. GM said they did this to aid in steering in a shorter radius. At least an inch if looked at form the rear. This was the reason for the factory fender flairs.

 

[Road Dog]

According to my data sheet a 2001 2500:
front: 68. 6" (4x2, 4x4)
rear: 68. 0"

It's even bigger for a 1500:
front: 68. 6" (4x4) 67. 6" (4x2)
rear 66. 9"

 

[SRath]

Good info, guys! Thanks, Road Dog, for the specs.

I don't think an additional inch or even two width on the front will hurt anything given the benefits I stand to gain.