They have had a lot of training with the 6.0, 6.4 and now the 6.7 powerjokes.
Have had, or, haven't had?
Training on operations is one thing, training on failure assessment is highly doubtful. They get training on hooking up the computer and following the decison tree for troublshooting and basic system operation, not much in the way of root cause assessment. They will be told that bad fuel will casue the failures. If the instructor is candid he will point out that there is not a good metric for how long the bad fuel has to be there or the variations of bad fuel and the subsequent damage. These training classes barely cover the complexity of the operations, beyond that it is the individuals initiative to learn more. Even then, if management says bad fuel and the tech disagrees there is little doubt of the outcome.
It is not that all techs, or even most, are bad at assessment and resolution. It is the fact they are frequently placed in a bad situation that is a no-wim scenario.
Ford is not doing anything different than Dodge has or is doing, bad fuel will always be the FIRST thing they check and if there is ANY question that is the determination, case closed, owners responsibility.
GM will get to that point after enough replacements cost them enough $$, did it before, will do it again.