my pop had one [before i was born]... until it broke a rod. . then it got a 350 gasser. .
we've had that 5. 7 and 6. 2 & 6. 5td diesels. . we had a 4. 3 v6 aluminum head diesel too in a cutlass sierra front wheel drive... heads were warped on it as gm engineers had their heads up some horses back end and set the thermostat on the cooling fans way too high [+200°f]. .
Learn something new everyday!
I know the 6. 2L was a fairly reliable and economical diesel in its time... it did have some head cracking and glow plug issues but, when you got one to hold together, they would provide as good or better mileage as a 1st gen Cummins. Friends of mine had a blazer with a 6. 2L... it did suffer a cracked head at one point, but it also had 235k on the ticker and still provided mid 20s on the highway!
The 5. 7L were a very economical engine, but they were just not a diesel, and could not hold together. A college guy had one tht reliably got him 25mpg on the daily commute to school.
steved