RustyJC said:
I'm not quite sure what that means. The Cy-Fair voters support their kids and their schools. Growth demands facilities to house and teach the kids. One reason the district is growing is that people are moving here to put their kids into quality schools.
If you think it's better to handle growth by rejecting bond issues and cramming the kids into portable buildings, I can certainly point you to plenty of school districts you'll
REALLY like.
Rusty
What it means is this. Californians (where I live) have been getting screwed for years. These so-called Bond initiatives are nothing more than an additional tax for property owners to pay. It's out of control here in California and voters are finally realizing how much it's costing.
Property taxes are designed to take the costs of schools and area growth into account. More houses are built, more people move into an area, and revenue from property taxes increases. However, the extra money received gets misappropriated and schools are left in the cold. But then we get buffaloed into thinking we need these huge bond measures- which we don't, we just need the goverment to spend the money accordingly. What we end up having is a group of people telling us how much our schools are in the toilet and there's no $$ to fix it.
In my town, they've had a high school bond measure on the ballot three times in the last few years. All three times it's been voted down. It's definitely NOT because we don't care or don't want to support our kids. The school is old. It's over quadruple it's original intended capacity. We also have two other additional current "bonds" on our property taxes which fund elementary schools in our area.
Heck, I pay an additional property tax on the community parks in my neighborhood, which includes a fancy baseball diamond. But can I use it?? Nope. It stays locked but for athletic leagues and sactioned events. But I'm paying for it. I suppose I can always play on the swings or teeter totter.
The only reason the bond is failing is because citizens are tired of getting raped on taxes every year. The people who should really pay are the developers who are making tons of $$ on these newer communities.
But hey, buildings don't make the schools- the teachers do. And last time I checked, the credentialing processes are the same throughout each state. They don't vary district to district. What's sad is teachers remain some of the lowest paid individuals in the country. It's sad the teachers get ignored for the issues of "new buildings. "
But enough thread hijacking. Ropinfool: I hope you get your wish and are offered the job. You'll have realty "sticker shock" compared to out here.
