Competition How's this compare for 2wd e/t

[ScottWright]

Well I finally got a chance to run my truck this weekend. Actually my fiance raced it, shes never been down the track before in her life. Went 14. 80 @ 90. 2 mph. Full 60 gallons of fuel on board, plus that stupid turbo wing I've yet to take off, and my hockey equip in the back. It went 2. 05 60' was the best. I'm not sure what boost or anything she left at. How does that compare for my mod's? I figured it wouldn't 60' that good, but I kinda expected it to MPH better. It was raced at 7400 lbs. (per the CAT scale)



thanks,

Scott

 

[manganos]

Don't know what to compare it too but 14's is hauling butt in a truck I had my 2000 Dakota R/T with boost running 12. 9 before I blew the head gasket. But 14's in a diesel is NICE !!!

 

[BillGotthelf]

Your 60' times are very good for your truck. The weight helps keep the tire spin down. I had a best of 1. 85 with the stock rear suspension but saw 1. 95's all the time.

 

[TStinson]

Best my RED '99 has produced is 14. 78 @ 94. 30 mph, 2. 4 60' ET, RT was . 570 - on a HOT HUMID August night @ Ben Bruce Raceway in Evadale, Tx. Yep... It raised a few eyebrows.



1999 QCab, SWB, 2WD, 5-spd, 3. 54. DD3's, DD UFM/drag, SB 13/1. 25 OFE clutch, 4" exhaust w/muffler, on STOCK 245 Michelins. Race weight is 7280# w/driver.



Oh yeah, this was with 215000 miles on the engine.



If'n I could only get it to hookup, 13's feel reachable. Also need MORE AIR!