I have been told that the in line BD exhaust brake is either:
1) better as it interferes less with exhaust gas discharge than the turbo mount and flow is more laminar down there. Similarly it is said that the turbo mount is pushed cause it is an easier install and causes increased temperature compared to the in line.
or
2) worse, as you have to do some welding; it is exposed to more water and dirt (not probably an issue with most paved road and gravel road use on a 4x4); it takes longer to kick in due to its position further downstream, it is less effective than at the turbo in producing braking power.
I used a turbo mount BD for 5 years on my 1998. 5 24 valve and loved it. It had more than enough braking power, never needed any adjustment, worked flawlessly. Never even knew about the in line unit until Bill Heath (Turbomaster in Ellensburg) recommended it.
The BD rep. hemed and hawed when asked about this, and Dave at Oregon Fuel Injection (very helpful guy) suggested that the Turbo mount was the better choice.
It would be nice to have some real data, few folks have had both I would guess.
Opinions or experience with both?
1) better as it interferes less with exhaust gas discharge than the turbo mount and flow is more laminar down there. Similarly it is said that the turbo mount is pushed cause it is an easier install and causes increased temperature compared to the in line.
or
2) worse, as you have to do some welding; it is exposed to more water and dirt (not probably an issue with most paved road and gravel road use on a 4x4); it takes longer to kick in due to its position further downstream, it is less effective than at the turbo in producing braking power.
I used a turbo mount BD for 5 years on my 1998. 5 24 valve and loved it. It had more than enough braking power, never needed any adjustment, worked flawlessly. Never even knew about the in line unit until Bill Heath (Turbomaster in Ellensburg) recommended it.
The BD rep. hemed and hawed when asked about this, and Dave at Oregon Fuel Injection (very helpful guy) suggested that the Turbo mount was the better choice.
It would be nice to have some real data, few folks have had both I would guess.
Opinions or experience with both?