Originally posted by Mopar-muscle
kat , why did you go with a 12 ? the big benifit i see wit hthe 40 is reducing EGT , i magine that running the 40 with the restrive 12 housing is negating any effct of lower EGT .
I have had some discussions with fellow gearheads in the gasser world about turbo modifications. While they run at a max boost of 24-28 psi the theory is the same.
Ralph Friend the owner of excessive motorsports has an RX-7 that cranks out over 450 HP with one T04 turbo. He ditched the stock twins and gained a bunch on top end, but it was laggy below 3K..... the fix? a smaller exhaust housing and a computer controlled wastgate.
Where an I going with this?
Exhaust housing effectiveness is dictated by the nozel area where the gases are directed into the turbine. The best way to lower EGT is to cool off the intake charge! There is a common misconseption about this on TDR. The HX-40 lowers EGT mostly by the cooler air charge it produces.
I have heard that the HX-40 has a higher volumetric flow rate on the air side than the HX-35 at similar boost pressures... . this is not true..... the ISB can only take so much air... . 35 psi is 35 psi regardless which turbo it comes from... . the diference between the two turbos is the temperature of the air at 35 psi. Where the HX-35 can easily exceed 400F above 35 psi the HX40 is still at or below 300F at 35 psi. We all know that as air heats up it becomes less dense, therefore there are fewer O2 molecuels to support combustion. If we can cool off the air, density goes up, and Mass Flow Rate goes up, while Volumeteric Flow Rate stays the same.
Take a look at a turbo compressor pressure map... . the axes are pressure ratio, and mass flow rate. Volumeteric flow rate is completely arbitrary and should not even be considered.
The solution for quick spool up and EGT control... ... find a turbo with a compressor map that suits your needs and then adjust exhaust housing size and wastgate setpoints to make it rock( this usually takes some creative engineering and specialty machining). That is exactly what Kurt has done here. I am suprised no one has thought of this untill now.
We have seen a lot of developement with regards to fueling, now we need some more development with regards to air and EGT management. This seems a little backwards to me, but oh well.