A little history lesson...
There are a couple of advantages to disk brakes and the first set I worked on I thought "What a great invention!" but those were actually Cleveland brakes on a 1963 Cessna 150, they are much the same as automotive "disc brakes" though they've been on light aircraft since the late 1950's.
First of all, those are not "Disc Brakes" by technically correct definition. They are Puck Brakes. There are true disc brakes on larger, faster aircraft and road tractors where multiple pistons push on a stack of alternating steel or carbon plates and brake material in discs that are concentric with the axle and inside the wheel.
Consumers have been sold a bill of goods regarding so-called disc brakes in newly manufactured cars and the after-market world and here's how...
Presuming that the quality of engineering and production are equal-
The puck type brakes are lighter because they use less materials, have far fewer parts, are far simpler to manufacture and work on, all while wearing out faster than a comparable drum brake due to being completely open to the world of dirt and grit and having less material.
Thus initial production costs are reduced and downline maintenance frequency is increased while profits are enhanced by allowing the same rate to be charged per axle for brake repairs!
The only performance enhancements come from the reduced mass of the puck brake system and open design which of course does allow for more rapid cooling. In motor sports these things are far more important than in the real world of daily driving and the brakes only have to survive 500 miles or so on the racetrack...
In mountain climbing, on a Porsche, Ferrari or aircraft ounces count. On a 6000 pound and up truck that is going to tow more than double that in a trailer at a fraction of the velocity achieved on the track or in the air?
Not so much...sorry!
If the RWAL valve were stuck open the front brakes should still bleed and work so the pedal would not go all the way to the floor with no resistance-or at least it shouldn't. The proportioning valve should not be designed so that it allows a single point failure that would disable the entire hydraulic brake system (the whole reason for isolating the front and rear brakes from each other). That said, Dodge expected that truck to go to the crusher in 10 years so perhaps there are multiple failures in either the proportioning valve or the Master Cylinder...
If those new rear pucks are not dragging at all then the pistons have not been extended from the fully compressed position. If that is the case the cause is that insufficient pressure has been applied to the rear brakes to extend the piston which would indicate substantial trapped air remaining in the system.
I suspect that the culprit is air trapped in the back side of the hollowed out pistons. Since the rear calipers are probably not connected with a flex hose I suggest that you open the bleed valve and tap on the cylinder casting of the caliper with a rubber mallet to break the surface tension that is trapping the air and allow fluid to gravity feed into the air space remaining in the cylinders.
If that fails you may have to dismount the calipers, remove the bleed valves and dribble brake fluid into the cylinders a drop at a time with something like a syringe or needle point oiler through the brake line port while holding the caliper piston side down and the brake port slightly elevated.
Good luck!