Media: "..Is there blood on Bush's hands for 9/11.."

Attention: TDR Forum Junkies
To the point: Click this link and check out the Front Page News story(ies) where we are tracking the introduction of the 2025 Ram HD trucks.

Thanks, TDR Staff

My OK CITY & Dallas trip

Illflem is 7 - Happy birthday!

I don't know about you guys, but as of last night it seems to me that the national media wants to lay the blame for 9/11 at Bush's feet, basically saying he has blood on his hands becuase he had knowledge of possible hijacking threats prior to 9/11.



If this is not the hight of Monday Morning Quarterbacking, I don't know what is. There are two Bimbos on the Boston morning talk radio basically (in not so many words) blaming Bush for the attack, especially one leftist b*tch who I can only imagine is frothing at the mouth this morning.



I am sure that the leftist media and Dems will play this out for all its worth and try to paint Bush as some evil uncaring ogar. I'll be waiting for Dashel or the Grand-wizzard from West Virginia to call for investigations into "what Bush knew and when did he know it!". Then there will be a call for impeachment. The Liberals are probably going into orgasm mode right now.



What do you folks think?



As for me, I don't care one way or the other what happens to Bush ... I voted for him in 2000, but won't be in 2004 due to his betrayal of the 1st Amendment by signing the CFR garbage. (If he will sell out on the 1st Amendment, he'll sell us all out on the remainder of the Bill of Rights if necessary). What a blood sport politics is ... sheeeeesh.
 
The question, then, is also: "Is there blood on Clinton's hands for Sept 11?



I am sure the president gets briefed regularly that some faction here or there, or some rumor of an attempted act somewhere in the world by someone, is trying to do something. That's the nature of intelligence.



It was outside the scope of anything in conventional wisdom, that 4 - 8 groups of people would, on the same day, nearly at the same hour, coordinate hijackings to make flying missiles of death of themselves.



Although the possibility had been thought of (I even know an ex-military man who studied and reported the possibility of this happening more than 20 years ago), the concept itself WAS foreign to us. Presidents, including Clinton and Bush and Bush and Reagan and Carter (and this goes on), got briefings of non- and some times very- specific threats, yet often have had little to no ability to deal with it, since knowledge is surely limited.



Please note the large number of "alerts" there have been already, yet nothing has happened, no large number of arrests, etc, etc.
 
Now that the dust has settled, the media will have a frenzy pointing fingers at our leaders for this whole thing. I just read the article on iwon.com about this. What the media conveniently forgets to tell us is that the feds receive warnings of terrorism almost daily. If there is enough "government intelligence" to be able to warn us of possible attack, then there should be enough to let us know where these people hide, convene, train and plan. In a certain sense, I feel sorry for Bush and his team because it happened to him. They have to deal with all the regular issues, plus this major disasterous event that has changed to world. If it had happened to a dem in office, the repubs would have had a hay day with it as well. I didn't vote in 2000, I thought they all stunk! Do you all think Gore would have done a better/different job? I'm not sure, but I do approve of most every action taken since 9/11 other than the war on terrorism seems to be dragging some. Guess I'm just impatient.
 
Bush is a good man. Better than a lot. All this crud from the Liberal Media is pure, 100% horse-$#)#.



I guarantee you what did NOT take place when Bush was briefed. The CIA or FBI did NOT say, "OK, Mr. President, on Sept. 11, Mohammad Atta and another 15 Arab Murderers are going to fly passenger planes into the World Trade Center. Do you want us to stop it or let it happen so you can be more popular?"



Every day the President gets briefed on MANY potential problems. To blame Bush for Sept. 11 is the most arrogant, idiotic, evil thing I can think of.



PSYCHPATHIC ARAB MURDERERS, including BinLaden, are responsible for 9-11. The sooner they are removed from the planet and sent to their murderous god Allah, the better.
 
Unbelievable!!!

Listening to the news all day, the media and the Dems are set up to start another "Watergate" investigation.



Gepfart, is demanding House hearings now and when asked if he believed that the info given to Bush prior to 9/11 could have prevented the attacks ... he says "I'm not sure, thats what we will have to find out. "



Man, what a sleezy hatefull partisen he is. We will be here "eating our own" chasing a white elephant, while our troops are in the field fighting the war, all so little Dick can get the gavel back in November.



I feel that the GOP is going to be toast this fall and Bush will be a lame duck for his remaining 2 years. Sad. :(
 
I'm anxiously waiting for the DEMs to control the House, Senate, and Presidency.



Maybe people will wake up and start the needed REVOLUTION and the DEMs will determine that there are real patriots still in America that do not hold to their BS.



That's what it is going to take - pure and simple!!



Why can't we come together and be a great country again?



A divided house can not stand!!
 
Those talk show hosts likely wouldn't be giving Clinton a hard time under the same circumstances.



Bush certainly is not to blame, and finding someone to blame this on is really not the point. However, someone did get caught with their shorts down.



I really feel that they (CIA, FBI, NSA, etc) collectively had enough knowledge to figure out something was going down. Problem is no one put it all together for whatever reason (politics, not playing on the same team, information hoarding, empire building, maybe information overload and they couldn't get through it all)



- The FBI and FAA folks raising the flag about arabs taking commercial flying lessons.



- WTC already a known target



- Known actions of suicide bombers (Kamakizi's forgotten way too soon it seems)



- Well known possibility of flying jets into targets (clancy wrote about it, agencies have mulled the possibilities for years).



- Airline stocks sold short days before it happened.



Yep, it is easy to step back and put it all together now. But folks, this is what these guys are PAID to do all day long. And, this is a very short list of what came out after the attack. Imagine the data they have that we are not being told.



Airline stocks being sold short in record numbers alone should have heightened awareness, though perhaps not enough to matter prior to the attacks.



Can't really blame anyone, the information was there no doubt. Why we couldn't figure it out, not who is at fault, should be the focus of all these efforts. I can dream at least, eh?



jon.
 
The 9-11 event is a product of our own ignorance and vulnerability. Just like Pearl Harbor, it couldn't happen. Our own policies in all kinds of agnencies led us to believe that the enemy would only attack us on foreign ground. No one ever imagined (although many believed) that it could happen here, using one of our own domestic flights as an example. The warning signs of September 11 were everywhere, I just think we choose not beleive them. Bad choice. Sometimes waking up to reality is ugly. you can't blame Bush for what happened any more than you can blame the system that made it easy for it to happen.



Kev
 
Total utter Dem BS to try and win the Nov. elections.



Nothing out of the ordinary, and Bush needs to use his power and get on Natinal TV and blast them, like the curs they are.
 
Guess they forgot about "United We Stand". . (again).



Didnt we just see this in Vietnam? I thought we learned our lesson about supporting our own people.



Im starting to think liberals arent even Americans. They certainly dont appear to care about her. They just suck off of the rest of us. Then try to tell us what we can't do.



Time to increase my NRA donations.
 
This is extremely simple... just look to history for the answer.



How many times in the past have people warned of upcoming "possible" attacks/dangers and been ignored?



Every one of us knows that if on september 1st Bush stated that he "thought" there might be attacks on the US and from now on we were going to spend tons of $$$ on increased security,etc...

he would have been laughed out of office.



The majority of Amercians need to be hit in the head with a brick before they will put on a helmet...



Luckily for us, we have the biggest, baddest helmets on the planet ;)
 
You just can't trust the media, like i've said for how long now? :rolleyes:

How many times a day does the U. S. get a threat? Now they want to blame this on him? Just makes you wonder how many people belive what they say. :rolleyes:



Andrew
 
Blame game again

Give me a break, this is just another Blame game. I am sure that Bush did not know any particulars in the 9/11 attacks. He probably heard the same thing that every president heard for the last 20 years + . It probably went something like this" Mr President, we have reason and inteligence to believe that a airline highjacking may take place somewhere in the next 2-6 months". Now how do you take action on this? The only thing he could have done different is go to a higher alert at airports. Which would have been ignored by the low paid security agencys anyway.



We were riding high and stupid before 9/11, thinking that a attack on our country was impossible if not improbable. We were taught a deadly lesson. I don't think we have the best helmets, just the thickest skulls!



To blame all your problems in goverment on the Dems or liberals is a perfect example of how thick they are... ..... We have to have the balance of right and left, or we can't stay on the road.
 
The DEMs and the liberal media people, are about to wet their pants because of Bush's popularit, and the probability of his being re-elected and the probability that his coat tail willl help other conservatives be elected, therefore it is simple: They are and will be trying to rake up ANYTHING that they can fabricate that might dent that popularity and its effect on the comming elections.

Simply put--they are in a panic mode and the media is out to get Bush for the left.



Vaughn
 
He would have to be suicidal

Can you imagine the president knowing about this and then allowing his cabinet and wife to stay at the White House. Can you imagine allowing up to 50,000 people (potential occupancy of the towers) to deliberately be put in harm's way. In my wildest dreams I couldn't even imagine Clinton allowing that to happen, let alone Dubya. The lib-Dems are cutting their own throat and they don't even realize it yet. I've heard of physician assisted suicide, but the Dems are way beyond that point now. What if he would have rounded up all Arab students taking flight lessons and deported them? These same snot-nosed whiney liberals would have played the race card for all it was worth. This is a very transparent attempt to get Bush politically. And it won't work. Just sit back and watch the self-inflicted carnage that is about to occur.
 
Mark my words - if the Democrats pursue this tack, they will have stepped on their political dorks big time!! This is so sick, it makes me want to puke! Stuff like this is the reason that there is not one Democrat holding statewide political office in the state of Texas. #@$%! #@$%!



Rusty
 
So you think the Democrats, media, and others are spewing crap about 911? Don' just post on this site. Post on their site and TELL THEM!!!!!!! All these politicin' peckerwoods MAKE ME TIRED.
 
The Liberal POS tried to attack Bush right after 9-11, and it back fired on them... . Hopefully this does too. You would hope an intelligent person would see through it, but Clinton got elected twice, we almost ended up with Gore, and the Other Clinton (who may be worse than the Slick Willie) got elected in NY, so I don't like to make assumptions on other peoples intelligence. :mad: :--) :--) :--) :--)



Darren
 
Back
Top