FIRST and foremost, I have NO axes to grind against ANY of the synthetics - I personally feel they are markedly superior to plain dino lubricants... I feel they are especially of value to industrial and commercial applications where long term operation and reliability are far more crucial than cost.
BUT, I also feel that in normal use by the average owner, the extra cost does NOT warrant that extra cost - nor would I personally consider going to the extreme of extended drain intervals in an effort to recoup that cost - excellent dino oils changed at normal intervals will deliver engine life FAR beyond what the VAST majority of owners will ever see in their trucks - some have registered well over 500,000 and even a MILLION miles on plain oils - so why spend the $$$ on the expensive stuff?
Warm and fuzzy feeling, secure that you have done the "absoulute BEST" for your truck? OK, if that's your bag, and you're willing to pay for it...
Here's a pointer to he Amsoil site where they provide comparative API test results for both competing synthetics and dino oils:
http://www.amsoil.com/performancetests/g1971/index.html
Not to inject a "dig" - but notice that Amsoil conspicuously avoided inclusion of Delo 400 or Rotella oils in that group - even tho' less popular dino oils WERE shown...
But then, those tests were not particularly aimed at diesel operation I suppose. The Amsoil ads included in the TDR magazine display a test graph showing wear tests that DO include Delo 400 and rotella - but be aware that the tests were done in 1996 over 7 years ago - and significant lubricant improvements and changes have been instituted by many refiners since that date...