But come on guy's they made the rear springs 8 inches longer to make it haul more Sounds like a bunch of BS to me![]()
I can't say either way, but they do look nice!
Rafael
Wouldn't longer springs be softer? Thicker springs would be stiffer, but longer ones should be softer.
Let's be honest - pretty much all advertising is bogus. Always has been, always will be. That's why you never make purchasing decisions based on the marketing material.
I like most truck commercials - I look at them like little miniature fictional movies. They usually show cool images of the trucks.
Letting these commercials influence your buying decision is almost as silly as buying [insert product name] because that's what's on [insert name of NASCAR driver]'s car. :-laf
Ryan
Raf, I have to agree with you, I also think they look nice, it's a shame the new Ford does not come with a Cummins, Alison Trans, and Dana pumpkins!!
I've been thinking about this "clever" marketing. I can't fault Ford for it, because in quoting towing or payload capacities the manufacturer is always going to use a stripped-down version of the biggest truck they have.If you look at some of the commercials for the "SuperDuty" Fords, they show a pickup and state it will pull up to 26,000 lbs. If you look at the "fine" print, it states it is a F-450! Many people don't see the "fine" print!
wayne
Well, to each his own... It looks to me like Ford and GM are having an FUGLY contest!!![]()
Wouldn't longer springs be softer? Thicker springs would be stiffer, but longer ones should be softer.
Not if its a thicker pack made up of a lot of thin long springs. It would be 'softer' but the load capacity can be higher.
If you look at some of the commercials for the "SuperDuty" Fords, they show a pickup and state it will pull up to 26,000 lbs. If you look at the "fine" print, it states it is a F-450! Many people don't see the "fine" print!
wayne