I assume these are the vision series you have purchased?
I really have to wonder sometimes about decisions made about school district purchases. Are the people making the decisions actually taking into account the long term service life of the vehicle? Or is it just which engine looks prettier or matches the outside of the bus better?? The vision is a nice bus, but the C7 is a crap engine. Its basically an emissions compliant rehash of the 3126/3116 and replaces the 3116's mechanical injectors with old IHC/ford HEUI engine technology. High maintenance costs and low reliability. Not to mention, at 7. 2l displacement, its over a liter larger than the Cummins option which just adds low mileage to a poor engine. I'm amazed that your district didn't go with the cummins option which is the obvious choice especially from a maintenance standpoint. Plus, Cat's parts prices are rediculous. I mean come on, adjusting valves on a brand new engine, jeez.
In regards to slathering all the brake rollers and hardware with antiseize, good idea, especially new from the factory, theres a lot of prep that many people don't do to a new bus. Well, I'm sure you know how it goes. Theres a lot to get done before a new bus' first passenger inspection. I've had brand new buses drive from the manufacturer to our shop for their first NY DOT inspection, with tens of miles on them, and fail miserably due to out of adjustment brakes, bolts not tight, and other various things.
RE:Tires off... Three years from now? Are you planning on actually having a set of brakes last that long in your district? Not to mention you should be removing wheels at every pre-inspection PM to mic the drums. God, I can't go 6 months without a brake job on any of our buses.
Anyway, good luck, I hope all your new buses get their stickers without problem!
-Dan
The Truck & Bus Stop Inc.
Brooklyn, NY