Buffalo said:
As I recall, the recommendation was to not use any additives. They have a tendency to change the engineering of an already properly engineered oil. The additives can work against the way the oil was originally engineered.
Joe F. (Buffalo)
Just for what it's worth, it's my understanding that typically, about 60% of the content of most oils is already ADDITIVES! Sure, those additives ARE developed and included by refiners to reach specific goals related to the properties of each brands specific oil - keeping in mind both engine manufacturer and EPA requirements. It isn't the ADDITIVES that are bad, it's the potential mis-matching of additives that might create problems!
SO, the REAL question is 2-fold:
1. WILL the addition of some additive YOU are interested in provide a goal that most specifically affects/benefits YOU and the way you normally use your vehicle?
2. IS it possible that SOME of the potential "unexpected consequences" of re-engineering the oil by use of additives just MIGHT create a conflicting adverse effect that outweighs the intended benefit?
And the bottom line is, unless you have very well established first hand experience with your intended additive, do you REALLY want to take a chance in modifying what most likely is an already pretty well designed lubricant?
Personally, for many years *I* was a regular user of the controversial STP oil treatment - particularly due to the added anti-scuffing component it provided existing oils while engaged in hard towing with our '91 Dodge. I had great success with that additive, and EXCELLENT oil analysis reports to back it up. BUT, substantial oil improvements in recent years, especially in the Delo 400 15/40 I use - mostly the recent addition of Molybdenum and Boron - have convinced me to just leave well enough alone - NO more oil additives for me!
YMMV!