Here I am

oil consumption

Attention: TDR Forum Junkies
To the point: Click this link and check out the Front Page News story(ies) where we are tracking the introduction of the 2025 Ram HD trucks.

Thanks, TDR Staff

2015 Ram 2500 TPMS oddity

Marine diesel

Pretty high usage for 1k, my 2010 chevy would eat thru oil it was how they designed the thing, at the end was 2-3 qt in 4k, never burned it or leaked, it just consumed it, it had to go. Always ran good oil and 5k changes. Nothing was going to help that thing.

Found this information only deal.

Could be all that Heavy Agressive Towing you do

20201102_222147.jpg

20201102_222227.jpg

20201102_222241.jpg
 
Last edited:
A friend of mine who is a high end mercedes tech (one of their top techs in the US) said that these cars have loose rings (on purpose) and they leak on start up and when cold. When they reach temp is when they tighten up. That explains the qt per 2000 miles. But, in my case, not a sudden qt in only 1000 miles.
 
Perform a leakdown test. This will likely show a high leakdown in the center 2 cylinders (just my guess).



I've got several friends with Toyotas that are plagued with the chronic drinking problem!
 
My buddy's 06 Dodge minivan has a "continuous oil change" going on since new. It sounds funny when low at over 200K on it... He has had some luck with reducing consumption by replacing the PCV valve.
 
If it had a sudden overnight increase in oil consumption it sounds like something went wrong with the multiair system. The air system uses engine oil to operate and looks like it is a failure point. The oil usage they are trying to pass off as normal with this engine is more likely a design/assembly flaw with the piston/rings/cylinders. I would talk to the dealer and see what they have to say about the air system.
 
Thats the next class action law suit....
BTW, I am in contact with the lawyers on this class action. I dont know if anything will ever actually come of it. But maybe this "recall" will at least slow down the consumption. I really like this little car except for that. And if I keep feeding it oil, it should still go 200k miles with proper care.
 
Chrysler had a V8 back in 60's or 70's that would always throw out the first quart of oil and then stop. I can not remember if it was the 440 or one of their others. If you left it a quart low it would stay there. Add the quart back in and shortly it was gone again.
 
They deny everything. In this case, all of the dealers Ive talked with have lived up to the name liars when questioned about the tigershark. Its really offensive.
Reminds me of the first time my 6.7 Powerstroke blew up. The dealer was telling me “this is the only one we’ve had fail!” And when I walked through the service bay there were a half dozen 6.7 long blocks sitting on the floor with ventilated blocks. No problem here, nothing to see.....keep it moving people!
 
Chrysler had a V8 back in 60's or 70's that would always throw out the first quart of oil and then stop. I can not remember if it was the 440 or one of their others. If you left it a quart low it would stay there. Add the quart back in and shortly it was gone again.
My brand new 1994 5.2 did exactly that.
 
Chrysler had a V8 back in 60's or 70's that would always throw out the first quart of oil and then stop. I can not remember if it was the 440 or one of their others. If you left it a quart low it would stay there. Add the quart back in and shortly it was gone again.
Never heard of that one. I owned/worked on and built quite a few 318 through 440's and never saw that.
 
Got a notice of "customer satisfaction sw update" for the pcm the other day that is supposed to fix the oil consumption problem in the 2.4 tigershark engines that are in darts and jeeps. Got it done on tuesday. We will see what happens. They say the problem occurs when coasting in city driving and short trips. Something about creating a vacuum (or stopping a vacuum ) condition in the cylinders by reprogramming the valves. Ive only driven a few miles since so I dont know if it really fixed the oil issue. But the trans does feel much tighter and the engine feels more responsive and maybe a little more power. We shall see.
 
Yes, now i remember it.
They got rid of zero-fueling during coasting or downhill. That was it, engine braking goes bad with the update.
Not a big deal in flat land but crucial in the mountains.
 
Yes, now i remember it.
They got rid of zero-fueling during coasting or downhill. That was it, engine braking goes bad with the update.
Not a big deal in flat land but crucial in the mountains.
So you are saying I will no longer feel the car downshift when rolling down hill ? The car does feel more responsive and seems to be in any gear I want it to be when rolling slowly down hill, but I dont feel like the torque converter hits as it downshifts. But in this little car, not a big deal. Even in the mountains. So if that fixes the oil consumption, I will be ecstatic. Thanks for the feedback
 
Please keep us updated on this topic, I'd like to hear first hand how it is with the update.

My HEMI does the same (fueling on decelaration) and it drives me nuts to say at least.
Even in Low Range it goes down the hill like an avalanche. Almost no engine braking.
 
Remember this is an oil consumption problem and they have told me the fix involves controlling when oil is being squirted (or not squirted) into the cylinders while coasting. This is way above my 1960's knowledge of engines and how they work.
 
Back
Top