LMcCary said:
Valve seals will cause a lot of oil consumption, even on a Diesel. They will not use oil on acceleration, unless crank case pressure is very high. The seals will however cause oil smoke and consumption on decceleration and at idle. This is sometimes confused with bad rings, which will also cause smoke on decceleration.
I agree to the post earlier that stated the cylinders may not be perfectly round. Upon close examination of at least three cylinders had light rust piting in the oil ring run area. Low tension rings hydro-plane on heavily oil ladden cylinder walls. I am not used to the problems caused by overhauling engines that use low tension rings. Once burned and now learned. From now on I will have the block Power-honed to make the cylinders round.
Thanks for all of the replies.
LMcCary
White '78 Dodge crew cab, '96 5. 9 cummins, NV 4500, Dana 60 3. 54 diff.
After reading the posts in response to mine, I would agree that under the conditions set out in the posts, that valve seals could cause the problem. I would suspect the exhaust side would be the bigger problem because of the flow dynamics of the exhaust stream when decelerating or idling. The presure/vacuum pulses would be sharper under those conditions on both intake and exhaust, but I think the greater would be on the exhaust. I had not considered that in my thoughts of the previous post, and as stated, I have not encountered such with any of the engines I have worked on.
Low tension rings do indeed have a problem with heavy oils, but should not have a problem with the recommended weight for a given engine.
Also be cautious about using blow-by or rather the lack there of, as the sole vindication of the rings. I have seen hundreds of engines that had good compression and little blow-by, but had bad or never seated oil rings and they used oil like a fiend. One of the main offenders in this senerio was the 71> Pontiac 455 engines. They had oil consumption to the tune of a quart in 200 miles and good compression rings.
We had good success in reringing them and giving them a 100 to 105 mph run-in after reassembly. (Done in short bursts form 70 to 105 to 70 to 105 to 70 - ect. 3 to 5 times. ) Not reccomended for the Cummins.
This is what makes the TDR so valuable to us the owner / mechanics, the fact that we all learn from each other and refine our knowledge and add to our experience without having to make all the mistakes ourselves.
I have been working on mechanical things for 52 years, rebuilt my first Briggs & Stratton at 13 or so, and rebuilt a 235 Chevrolet at 15, after that there are many. Have been a professional mechanic for 33 years. 7 years in engine, transmissions, differentials and front ends.
26 years as a shop owner operator. I say the above not to sound better then, but to say I know that I can always learn something new. Thanks for the correction / addition.