Originally posted by JJP:
Does anyone have the rickson 19. 5's on their 2500? I'm considering them but am worried that with a 3. 54 rear end and an auto transmission that I'm asking for trouble. ...
I put 'em on my '98 3. 54 auto. Specifically, I put 225/70 Yokohama TY303s on. They are about 8% bigger
around. I rarely haul (usually 1-2 tons of horse dung), but when I do, the Yokos are up to the task. Empty, the ride is softer (the tires seem to absorb the highest frequencies of jolts), but firmer (stiffer sidewalls), and steering control is better.
I lost an embarrassing amount of rubber due to atrocious alignment, but I still expect to get at least 100K miles out of the tires. The Yokos aren't as quiet as I might like them to be, but I can now hear the engine at highway speeds.
I run 75 PSI front and 65 PSI rear. The fronts seem to have full tread contact. 65 PSI is a tad much for the rear; I really should drop it to 55 or 60 - the outer edge of the rear tires don't make much contact with the road.
I adjusted the speedo/odo to read 1. 5% over true; I expect that when the tires are worn out, the readings will be 1. 5% under true - on average, the odo will be dead on. The speedo is not very accurate or linear, so I opted to make the odo accurate.
At 70MPH, the tach dropped from about 2000 to around 1850 in OD. Unladen, the truck has no problem with most grades. It does slow down on the steep grades on I-64 in West-by-God-Virginia near VA; I don't quite have to take it out of OD. However, if I do, I can easily maintain 55-60 in direct, running at 2600-2800 RPM. Generally, if I hit the hill doing 85, the boost stays up and I don't slow down much at all.
Fuel economy? Hard to tell if there's any difference. Typically I've been getting 17 MPG on the highway, running 75-80, though I'll lose perhaps 2 MPG if I'm running into a strong headwind. However, I just drove back from Hell and kept the speed down to 70; I got 19. 2 MPG, something I haven't seen since the truck was new!
So, fuel economy didn't really change with the larger, yet heavier, tires.
Next, Dan and his sidekick are good guys to wirk with. They're quietly competent, uncomplaining and got the job done right the first time.
And the last point, my truck looks much more 'manly' with the larger tires, lower profile and big grey wheels. (I never have liked wheel covers; the stock hub caps look fine to me... . ) Of course, any passengers I had complained about the large step into the 4x4; it's now an inch higher, and the few passengers are more vociferous. I may have to install that electric hide-away step just to silence them. (The grand leap up into the truck helps keep me young, so I rather like the extra height!)
As an aside, the tread width on my 225/70s is the same as the 265/70/17s on my brother's new F150. I didn't really want a wider tire, just taller, and that's pretty much what I got.
In all, if you stick with around 8% difference in circumference, you'll be quite happy with 19. 5s.
GAAAAAASP Geez. I must've forgotten to inhale.
#ad
Fest3er