Looking at both hand guns, want protection while berry picking and ATV'ing.
44 MAG, Super RedHawk or 444 UltraLite, 2 1/2 - 2 1/4" barrel vs 4".
Already have several 44 mag carbines, thus my pick for staying with this caliber.
I know it's a large cannon, and a . 40 SW would probably be more practical for everyday protection, but it will be my only firearm while my wife and I are out and about. Either barrel length would be suitable, can someone tell me advantages/dis-advantages?
Ruger Super Redhawk Alaskan Double-Action Revolver Models
Taurus International Manufacturing Inc
Kind of leaning towards the Taurus, lighter and less $.
TIA, Jess
44 MAG, Super RedHawk or 444 UltraLite, 2 1/2 - 2 1/4" barrel vs 4".
Already have several 44 mag carbines, thus my pick for staying with this caliber.
I know it's a large cannon, and a . 40 SW would probably be more practical for everyday protection, but it will be my only firearm while my wife and I are out and about. Either barrel length would be suitable, can someone tell me advantages/dis-advantages?
Ruger Super Redhawk Alaskan Double-Action Revolver Models
Taurus International Manufacturing Inc
Kind of leaning towards the Taurus, lighter and less $.
TIA, Jess
Last edited by a moderator: