My 'old' factory clutch came out today, and the new SBC Con. O is in. Seems the flywheel had a noticeable ripple to the surface, but not from wear, the new grind is nice, I'll tow with it by Saturday to see. The 'old' clutch otherwise looked new, but slipped under load (200-400RPM 6th gear, 65MPH, pulling 7400 lbs), the new clutch seated quickly and does not.
This is what comes to mind, could the undulations in the flywheel surface, only a few thousandths, but noticeable to the touch, have caused the slippage under load? The waviness is NOT wear.
Since the SBC clutch is a LUK's clutch , what makes them different? The pedal feel is identical, the appearance of the friction material is identical, only the rivets appear that they may be different and the metallic in the clutch face appears to have more copper, maybe.
So, SBC, is this Con. O in fact a LUK clutch for an extra couple hundred dollars, or what are the real differences? How is the increased plate loading achieved?
BTW, this transmission is one big mother!
This is what comes to mind, could the undulations in the flywheel surface, only a few thousandths, but noticeable to the touch, have caused the slippage under load? The waviness is NOT wear.
Since the SBC clutch is a LUK's clutch , what makes them different? The pedal feel is identical, the appearance of the friction material is identical, only the rivets appear that they may be different and the metallic in the clutch face appears to have more copper, maybe.
So, SBC, is this Con. O in fact a LUK clutch for an extra couple hundred dollars, or what are the real differences? How is the increased plate loading achieved?
BTW, this transmission is one big mother!