Here I am

thinking about he351ve in 5.9 engines

Attention: TDR Forum Junkies
To the point: Click this link and check out the Front Page News story(ies) where we are tracking the introduction of the 2025 Ram HD trucks.

Thanks, TDR Staff

Mega cabs . . .

3 Stick Shifter

i know others have already installed the vnt turbo from the 6. 7 but to date i have not see any version i like. so i have been pondering an he351ve turbo on the 5. 9 engine trucks. im thinking along the lines of a kit sort of package that many people would be willing to install. that means no adapters, at least not backyard looking ones and i dont want to have to change a lot of parts such as intake and charge pipes. also i want to steer away from any standalone aftermarket electronics.



on the first part, im thinking a steed speed exhaust manifold would work very well. they are working on a manifold for the ve, i think it is intended to bolt bolt to the 5. 9 engines and will allow the turbo to bolt up directly. they do not really mention what options there will be for flange position, at this point i am going to assume there will be several options, allowing different mounting positions, i dont know how well the ve clocks, so it may matter it may not. with this i think the mounting problems will be easily solved and will look clean and professional.



controlling the ve is going to be the tough part. my first question is how is the turbo controled from the factory. is it pwm or some other signal type control? or is it variable voltage like a throttle position sensor. i found a you tube vidieo of someone bypassing the electronics, basically he just hooked it straight up. HE351VE Motor Control - YouTube the problem i am seeing is the motor just spins. so what makes it stop in the proper place both forward and back? this is where i need help, my understanding of the various electronic controls is limited.



i dont know if the factory contorler can be made to work, but here is what i was thinking for a control setup. im thinking about using a stepper motor similar to that of a pyrometer, as the voltage increases it turns a certain amount according to voltage. this would be mounted to the nozzle controller inside the turbo. no voltage would deafult the motor to the maximum spool position and 12v would be maximum flow. controlling the voltage would be a pressure sensor that as pressure increased so would the voltage, im not sure if it would be better to use drive pressure or boost, or if it really matters. this would move the stepper motor and adjust the vanes. its simple enough in theory, practicality will be much different i am sure. also a three positon switch could be wired into the stepper motor. one position would cut all voltage forcing the nozzle closed, this would be used as the exhasut brake function. the second postion would leave the controller to function as normal. the third postion would supply 12v to the turbo forcing it open, this could be handy for a few reasons. the last thing i am thinking about, is having a variable knob inside the cab, like those used for bass boost knobs. im thinking this could be useful for relieving some drive pressure while cruising.



my last concern is with using the stepper motor. i saw a couple of vidieos where the variable actuation was controled by a spring. that makes me worried that the stepper motor would be over come by the drive pressure. is there a stepper motor that has enough strength to handle such a problem.



let me know what you guys think maybe if we pool all of our knowledge together we can find something easy and simple to control the vnt.
 
While Steed Speed makes EXTREMELY nice exhaust manifolds, at this point in time, not a single one of them that he makes for Cummins applications (and there are at least six of them) will be a drop-in replacement for the 5. 9 or 6. 7 stock manifold. This is for the simple reason that he makes ALL of his Cummins exhaust manifolds "2nd gen style" with the outlet flange in the middle between cylinders 3 and 4, not farther back betweeen cylinders 4 and 5, like on the common rail CTD's. The reason he does so is because it is MUCH easier to make a well-balanced and good flowing manifold with the turbo flange placed at the center of said manifold. And most people who are buying aftremarket manifolds to use with aftermarket turbos are also changing the inlet/outlet piping that works with those turbos and CAI's and mainfolds. That being said, Lane IS planning on making a Cummins exhaust manifold that will have the VGT type flange on it (in fact the prototype is already made) BUT it also has the flange in the center, which means the turbo will still need different inlet and outlet piping and thus it will NOT be a drop in conversion for the HE351ve VGT turbo on either a 6. 7 or 5. 9 CTD.

How do I know all of this??
I have talked to Lane, the owner and "manifold-savant" of Steed Speed, several times about making one of his excellent manifolds for a plug'n play version for people who want to do EXACTLY what you (and I !!!!!) want to do-- put an HE351ve from a 6. 7L onto a 5. 9L CTD.


In fact, I talked with him last Thursday, and where we left things is that I will be drawing up a sketch/diagram based on the oem 6. 7L exhaust manifold that is sitting in my garage, and I will also send him a tracing of the turbo flange gasket that fits the HE351ve, so that he can actually play around with his CAD program and see what he can come up with. He really IS a manifold genius (just look at his Cummins "competition header" or ANY of them for that matter) and I am pretty sure that he will come up with something that will FLOW better then the stocker 6. 7L manifold, which ALREADY flows better then the oem 5. 9L manifold !!! And if he can't, I am sure that he will just say so... he has plenty of bsuiness anyway. All in all, he has been an easy going, knowledgable and patient person to talk with. Occasionally, he picks up the phone himself!! I will likely get the drawings out to him next week and expect to hear back from him sometime after that.

AFAIK, in fact, NO one is making an aftermarket 5. 9l or 6. 7L exhaust manifold that has the correct Type "WGMT" (some people refer to it as a type T4i) turbo flange. Though there are MANY aftermarket exhaust manifolds to fit 3rd/4th gen trucks, unless I have missed one, ALL of them have either a T3, T4 or T6 turbo flange outlet, because those are the flanges on the aftermarket/upgraded turbos that poeple are buying, not the unique/one-off Type WGMT flange like on the HE351ve. And while there are PLENTY of flange adapters available, due to the close tolerances involved, the use of an adapter even 1" thick will cause interference between the PS shock tower and the HE351ve turbo.

As of right now, the ONLY way to do a plug'n play version of this conversion, in terms of turbo and piping, is to use the oem 6. 7L exhaust manifold, with delete plates and the HE351ve turbo and the downpipe off the HE351cw (oem 5. 9L turbo). Unless and until Steed Speed or someone else makes a 6. 7L style exhaust manifold, that is the ONLY way to keep the geometry of all the exhaust and air pipes in line for a drop-in fit.


I already have a super low mileage (14k) HE351ve turbo take-off, with an oem 6. 7L manifold , including delete plates, sitting all pretty in my garage. I also have no prejudice with using the Fleece standalone electronic controller for the HE351ve. In fact, I am quite sure that despite a quirk that does not allow one to use the exhaust brake feature of the controller while using the oem cruise control, the controller is a well designed, well built, tuneable unit that seems to be working VERY well for the people who are using it in HE351ve conversions.

OK... that's enough on exhaust manifolds and turbo flanges for right now... I'll post more later.
 
Last edited:
thanks for the info. i was actually thinking that a center mounted flange would allow for the turbo to drop in place on a 2nd gen. it looks like the intake pipes are the same size and so should slip on and seal just fine. the exhaust would need some work but nothing more than a properly setup down pipe. i was thinking and maybe i was wrong, that with the turbo center mounted in the approxamaite position of the factory one, the housing could be clocked to match the intake tubes and should line up with little or no modification.



the reason for going away from the fleece controller is, as far as i know they do not have one that will work with the older 12v engines. ive seen the youtube vids but hear from others that they are not working on one soon. the fact that last time i checked there was nothing on their website about a ve controler for the 351 makes me want to search out other means. something that would work on any truck, without anything more than a couple switches, sensors, or actuators.
 
While Steed Speed makes EXTREMELY nice exhaust manifolds, at this point in time, not a single one of them that he makes for Cummins applications (and there are at least six of them) will be a drop-in replacement for the 5. 9 or 6. 7 stock manifold. This is for the simple reason that he makes ALL of his Cummins exhaust manifolds "2nd gen style" with the outlet flange in the middle between cylinders 3 and 4, not farther back betweeen cylinders 4 and 5, like on the common rail CTD's.

I may be misunderstanding this, but I have a direct replacement (to stock) Steed Speed Manifold (3rd gen style). It has been great so far!

George
 
I may be misunderstanding this, but I have a direct replacement (to stock) Steed Speed Manifold (3rd gen style). It has been great so far!

George

NOT a misunderstanding...ONLY the passage of time ...

Since I posted that info way back 2011 ;), Steed Speed had finished the R&D and production of their direct fit 5.9 exhaust manifold.

I have one too !!!
 
Last edited:
I'd like your guys thoughts on a he351ve on a 5.9 truck, I want a exhaust brake so it's this route or adding a pac or bd brake.
"This" route (vgt turbo) would give a flatter torque curve AND braking....
 
NOT a misunderstanding...ONLY the passage of time ...

Since I posted that info way back 2011 ;), Steed Speed had finished the R&D and production of their direct fit 5.9 exhaust manifold.

I have one too !!!

Dang! Sorry. I need to look at the date on the post! My bad! ;-)
 
Well, I hoped for 1 reply.
I have been reading and sooting/sticking has been a problem.
Just go with a "down stream" exh brake and call it good?
 
I bought a VE turbo years ago to do this install and ended up selling it. I wasn’t overly happy with the controller options and programming. Can’t say I’ve looked into it in many years, but a well tuned VE will flatten the torque curve out. So really it comes down to cost vs benefit. If you get a controller, manifold, and turbo for a similar cost as an exhaust brake then why not.
 
Potential issue with any variable turbo. 6.7’s have programming to help, as should any aftermarket controller. But still a possibility.
 
Back
Top