Here I am

Engine/Transmission (1994 - 1998) Turbo Questions

Attention: TDR Forum Junkies
To the point: Click this link and check out the Front Page News story(ies) where we are tracking the introduction of the 2025 Ram HD trucks.

Thanks, TDR Staff

2nd Gen Non-Engine/Transmission Dodge re-painting

2nd Gen Non-Engine/Transmission stack questions

Status
Not open for further replies.
My 96 in sig. will be going to Scheid in the near future for studs and fire rings. I was talking to them today and I was telling them that I was in need of a turbo because it is hard to keep the pyro down since the new plate. I had already decided that I was going with a Phat shaft 62, but he was telling me about a S300G turbo that they were using with real good results and I was wondering if anybody here was using one and what kind of results they were having? My goal with this truck is about 350 hp and 700 to 800 ft. lbs. of tq. It has to be completely usable because it pulls a 12k trailer every day. Thanks for your time and responce in advance.

MGarland
 
Our Phat Shaft 62 is a good turbo. We also make a Super Phat Shaft 62 that is a great turbo. The difference is the turbine side is much larger on the Super Phat Shaft 62. The larger turbine drives the compressor at higher rpm's, this makes more cfm on the compressor side and relieves the drive pressure on the turbine side. We have both in stock and the Phat Shaft 62 is less money than the Super Phat Shaft 62. We allow people to upgrade so you are not stuck with any thing you buy if you want to go up to a bigger turbo. Thanks www.industrialinjection.com
 
Last edited:
are you taliking about scheids lightning turbo, i would like to know more about this turbo too. i don't beleive it's a stock s300, they say it will make mid 60's boost and is not streetable and only has a 2. 8in inducer
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top