To answer this question for a TDR member I did some research back to Issue 75, page 68.
In that article, there was the comparison of the Ford, GMC and Ram by an unbiased magazine group led by Pickuptrucks.com. We lost miserably, by 1MPG towing with a load. Ford showed 9. 5MPG versus the Ram at 8. 5. For their 2000 mile trip, the fuel for the Ram was $99 more than the Ford. However the Ford used an estimated 6 gallons of DEF (6 x $3. 00=$18 ).
If we assume, as mentioned in the Ram literature, That the Ram will get 10% better mileage... well let's go ahead and figure that the Ram can equal the Ford at 9. 5MPG.
I think you see where this is going: For a 2000 mile trip the New 2013 will save you ( $99-$18 =$81 ) $81 over the 2012 engine in my fictious example.
So, in really round numbers, the advantage to using the DEF is about 8%.
Robert Patton
In that article, there was the comparison of the Ford, GMC and Ram by an unbiased magazine group led by Pickuptrucks.com. We lost miserably, by 1MPG towing with a load. Ford showed 9. 5MPG versus the Ram at 8. 5. For their 2000 mile trip, the fuel for the Ram was $99 more than the Ford. However the Ford used an estimated 6 gallons of DEF (6 x $3. 00=$18 ).
If we assume, as mentioned in the Ram literature, That the Ram will get 10% better mileage... well let's go ahead and figure that the Ram can equal the Ford at 9. 5MPG.
I think you see where this is going: For a 2000 mile trip the New 2013 will save you ( $99-$18 =$81 ) $81 over the 2012 engine in my fictious example.
So, in really round numbers, the advantage to using the DEF is about 8%.
Robert Patton