What's it take to do 0-60 in under 6.11 sec

[Giachino]

Checking out the new tundra on the web..... 381hp, 401 lbs... . 0-60 in 6. 11 sec for the 4x4 double cab.....



What's that equate to in hp / tq reqts for a 4x4 double cab CTD to do the same??

 

[JVolpe]

About a 12-15psi 4wd power break launch with maybe a 100hp performance box and a tc/transmission that will hold it.

 

[Giachino]

So doing a GDP, VB/TC/BI transmission Mods & Smarty mod lvl 9 should be sufficient?



Is a boosted 4x4 launch necessary? If so, is that so you don't get squirly off the line and start spinning? Just curious, becasue I dont envision lining up at a traffic light and doing a 15psi boosted launch unless the person next to me is just being absolutely obnoxious... .

 

[Bertram65]

Good luck, best my truck could do with a Quadzilla 100hp box, intake and exhaust was 8. 1 0-60. I measured it with a G-Tech performance monitor.

 

[Bob4x4]

Giachino,that toyota has a ton less to cart around,you will need to be very serious to beat one.



Bob

 

[OT-OF-HERE!!]

6.11 sec

With a FASS 150, AFE intake, Juice & EZ stack, ATS T/C, VB, Frolnt shaft... everything else stock w/ 4X4 launch I did 5. 1. 6. 11 isn't hard to beat with our trucks.

 

[Giachino]

Thanks for the feedback guys... . it's really more a matter of curiosity rather than need... . and i'm as serious as my wallet allows me to be! ... . and not getting my bonus this year is really taking the wind out of my sails..... should have had my want list completed already!... who ever said patience is a virtue is a missing a screw!

 

[betterthanstock]

I found this:

Our dynamometer test of the Tundra returned a rear-wheel power reading of 321 hp, about what one would expect if you assume drivetrain losses to be 15 percent. Unleashing this powertrain down the drag strip, we recorded a stunning 0-60-mph time of 6. 3 seconds, while the quarter-mile came up in 14. 8 seconds at 93. 7 mph. Mind you, this is a Double Cab 4x4 truck that weighs 5,637 pounds.





So for a typical Ram 4x4 at 7000 lb, you need 7000/5637x321hp=398hp at wheel.

A lot of people here have that. Of course, the transmission (6 speed in this case) matters too, and there is no turbo lag with the NA gasser...

 

[Bertram65]

I found this:

Our dynamometer test of the Tundra returned a rear-wheel power reading of 321 hp, about what one would expect if you assume drivetrain losses to be 15 percent. Unleashing this powertrain down the drag strip, we recorded a stunning 0-60-mph time of 6. 3 seconds, while the quarter-mile came up in 14. 8 seconds at 93. 7 mph. Mind you, this is a Double Cab 4x4 truck that weighs 5,637 pounds.





So for a typical Ram 4x4 at 7000 lb, you need 7000/5637x321hp=398hp at wheel.

A lot of people here have that. Of course, the transmission (6 speed in this case) matters too, and there is no turbo lag with the NA gasser...

Just imagine what a 2wd regular cab is going to run.

Nice to see a engine in a truck that really puts out the power, most guys who have dynoed the 5. 7L hemi report somewhere around 240hp at the wheels.

 

[AWise]

31% drive train loss? I think it is closer to 25% but that still sucks. Most 5. 7 trucks dyno in the 260hp range.