Fat cat's at the top?? Well let's see for example GM employs about 284,000 people, the CEO G. Richard Wagoner, Jr (if that link isn't enough here's another)got paid 40. 7 million over a 3 year period. Now lets do the math $40. 7m divided by 3 years is 13. 6m per year divided by 284,000 people is less than $50. 00 per employee per year. Your right those "Fat cat's" at the top are just killing the company. Lets ignore the fact that every single employee that is currently working for GM is footing the bill for 2. 5 retired workers. Here is a good article if your interested to find out what's really killing them. Not that SOME CEO's are not overpaid but to take a socialist view on what you think is a fair wage for someone who has obviously put in years of hard work and risk to get where they are is unfair. Who's going to take the risk and stress of running a large company (and yes someone has to be on top) if there isn't any reward for doing it? Honestly how many people would go to medical school if the pay wasn't any better than the guy mopping the floor?
If you are in a union in a hospital, you can mop a few halls and get paid better and have better/less hours then doctors tho... ... :-laf :-laf :-laf :-laf
Last edited by a moderator: