We have been quite fortunate in finding the Williams Controls site, and the widely varying options they offer as potential substitutes for what DC used in the APPS. We as a group, have been even MORE fortunate that Timbo has developed, and is distributing a direct replacement APPS, built around one of the Williams APPS modules, which so far seems quite successful - let's hope that approach continues to rack up MANY successful miles!
BUT, let's NOT put all our eggs in one basket - and prematurely stop continued efforts to find additional options, or further refine what we have already established - with the goal of rendering them more easily copied and used by owners with limited abilities and tools.
In my own case, use of a potentiometer TOTALLY foreign to this type service, and the MS for the IVS, went smoothly and trouble-free, in spite of complete lack of attention or measurement of related voltages - checking resistance and matching to the OEM APPS seemed to be close enough for it all to work properly - truth is, there's really not much room for error is setting the MS operation - too close and it bottoms out, too far away, and it won't trip!
BUT, perhaps my own setup success was pure luck - and to continue my own route of testing, I plan 2 more similar setups - one using the pot section only of a "failed" APPS and added MS for the IVS function - and the other, will be one of the Williams modules, but the potentiometer-only version, to which will also be added the MS for IVS function.
I personally feel that AS LONG AS we use a potentiometer total end-to-end resistance spread in the 2500 ohm or so range the ECM wants to see, and reasonably center actual potentiometer wiper in the middle of that range (my OEM APPS measured a swing of about 1600 ohms, with 300 unused on the low side, the rest on the WOT side), there is no NEED to be overly concerned about voltages - and the MS needs only to be adjusted to trip just a bit off idle, and then return reliably back at idle - which is no real trick, since mechanically, that's the ONLY way it installs anyway!
I may well be all wet in my theory - but I'll find out soon enough! :-laf:-laf
I've pointed it out before, and will again - I have poor faith in the use of typical electronics switching for the IVS, and while the Williams setup MAY be more robust in design and reliability than the OEM one DC used, we don't KNOW that for sure, and I hate to abandon other potential substitutes, only to find out later that the Williams setup presents all the SAME failure tendencies the OEM one does, and for all the SAME reasons!
And yes, the external, MS approach is ALSO very much untested, and MIGHT prove to have serious shortcomings and issues of it's own - so we need as much testing of ALL options as possible - the MORE potential solutions we have under test, the better.