After reading discussions at this site regarding the Smarty Jr programmer I am still confused regarding what features are desirable to adjust from stock programming to achieve my goals. I am satisfied with the stock power level on my 2007 5. 9 HPCR for my application which is pulling a 10,000 lb fifth wheel or hauling a 2,600 lb cabover camper.
• I would like to advance the timing to optimum level to reduce EGT and maximize fuel efficiency.
• I want to avoid an increase in rail pressure above factory stock to maximize injector life and avoid other reliability issues. This is based on reading the TDR Issue 63 article by Joe Donnelly on the Smarty products and the letter to the editor in the HPCR section by P. McMahon where Donnelly’s reply cautions about elevating rail pressure. Donnelly warns that the elevated rail pressure from the Smarty power setting resulted in actuation of the pressure relief valve. In addition he warns of the increased wear on the injectors due to higher rail pressure with no net gain in fuel economy.
• I have reviewed information on the MADS Electronics website but it is not clear to me how you would achieve the goals I’ve outlined. Donnelly’s article describes the software as providing adjustment of (1) torque management settings, (2) rail pressure settings, and (3) injection timing curves. I know I will want to adjust (3) to optimum. I know that I want to avoid adjusting (2) above stock levels. I don’t know how adjustment of (1) from stock levels will be an advantage to me.
• Since 90% of the time I am hauling with this truck, I assume that I would just set the SW setting to towing (level 2?). Are the torque and injection timing adjustments discussed in the Smarty manual further refinements of the default values established by SW2? Is there increased rail pressure at level 2?
• Furthermore, I don’t fully understand the point of adjustable power (Power on Demand). Why not just reprogram for the overall SW setting you need. If you use your truck for one purpose (hauling), is POD really an advantage?
• In Donnelly’s article he mentions that “Cummins retards timing more at higher loads for emissions reasons”. Does this imply that advancing timing will have an even more profound impact on fuel economy under load (hauling) than when empty at cruising conditions? I understand the advantage with regards to EGT.
Would appreciate any advice and clarification that others could provide.
• I would like to advance the timing to optimum level to reduce EGT and maximize fuel efficiency.
• I want to avoid an increase in rail pressure above factory stock to maximize injector life and avoid other reliability issues. This is based on reading the TDR Issue 63 article by Joe Donnelly on the Smarty products and the letter to the editor in the HPCR section by P. McMahon where Donnelly’s reply cautions about elevating rail pressure. Donnelly warns that the elevated rail pressure from the Smarty power setting resulted in actuation of the pressure relief valve. In addition he warns of the increased wear on the injectors due to higher rail pressure with no net gain in fuel economy.
• I have reviewed information on the MADS Electronics website but it is not clear to me how you would achieve the goals I’ve outlined. Donnelly’s article describes the software as providing adjustment of (1) torque management settings, (2) rail pressure settings, and (3) injection timing curves. I know I will want to adjust (3) to optimum. I know that I want to avoid adjusting (2) above stock levels. I don’t know how adjustment of (1) from stock levels will be an advantage to me.
• Since 90% of the time I am hauling with this truck, I assume that I would just set the SW setting to towing (level 2?). Are the torque and injection timing adjustments discussed in the Smarty manual further refinements of the default values established by SW2? Is there increased rail pressure at level 2?
• Furthermore, I don’t fully understand the point of adjustable power (Power on Demand). Why not just reprogram for the overall SW setting you need. If you use your truck for one purpose (hauling), is POD really an advantage?
• In Donnelly’s article he mentions that “Cummins retards timing more at higher loads for emissions reasons”. Does this imply that advancing timing will have an even more profound impact on fuel economy under load (hauling) than when empty at cruising conditions? I understand the advantage with regards to EGT.
Would appreciate any advice and clarification that others could provide.