per recommendation by John Martin (Issue 75?), I use the Fleetguard 16035 from Geno's Garage.
I am guessing you are referring to the article in Issue 71?
https://www.genosgarage.com/GenosGarageTechArticles/TDR71_LubeOilFiltration.pdf
It has been coming up more and more lately and I really wish they would do a new one with better information.
As TDR articles go that was one of the more disappointing ones I have read. There is both false and missing information in it and I would not use it as a sole source in selecting filters.
A couple of the blatant issues, IMHO, are the review is complacently missing filter flow ratings. The OEM oil pump is rated from 20 GPM @ 4200 rpms. The Fleetguard filters are 8.72GPM filters, so they only offer their best filtration at low/mid rpms and not as rpms increase.
The review also doesn't include the Donaldson DBL7349 (at the time ELF7349 which is just an older part number for the same filter) which has the best flow and filtration ratings of any filter.
The Wix 57620XE is not a synthetic filter and it never has been, per Wix, so I am not sure why it would be reported as such.
The statement "(best you can purchase in the industry at 25 micron)" is false. There were filters on his test that exceeded that rating. The PL45335 is currently rated 20µ @ 99.9%. They are often an overlooked filter but IIRC don't have the dirt holding capacity to support longer drain intervals.
Aside from the false information on the "industry" best no real micron ratings were included, which are rather important in a filter review.
Dirt holding capacity was not included which along with micron rating is important in a filter review.
Some other small issues with the article.
J1985 is a single-pass fuel filtration test, not a pressure drop test. J1985 is not used for oil filters.
Absolute is 98.7%, not 98.6%. It's a small error but an error nonetheless.
The Cellulose Fleetguard filter is not a 40µ filter it is a 35µ absolute filter as reported in 2011. Fleetguard now reports it as a 30µ @ 95% filter.
Maybe the most frustrating aspect of the article is that these issues were brought up in 2011 and the article has yet to be fixed/redone.