Nope, you will continue disagree in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, I will continue not caring one way or another. Your issues seem to be with SSI and it is pretty clear what they think. Let's just have that again to make sure it is clear:
The DSS, also known as the "Darin's Steering Stabilizer" is designed to eliminate steering wander in the Dodge Ram pickups. It does this by adding an additional bearing to the bottom of the steering box sector shaft and by adding an additional cross member tying the frame rails together eliminating frame flex. In other words, takes the slop out of your steering.
Wow.....I clearly gave you an out to run with your own opinion and let me have mine, but you chose to circle back. Are you always this way?
So again, in midst of the debate, I don't believe frame flex was the number one reason, but you obviously do, as so quoted:
"The steering brace is to stop the twist in the frame where the steering box mounts that contributes to steering deflection"
"frame flex was the original problem the design addressed"
"the original DSS was built with one goal in mind. Ancillary benefits were realized by supporting that long leverage point without a doubt. However, it was still developed primarily as a response to the deflection that occurred with that design"
I instead believe that shaft deflection was the original intent of the steering box brace, with the added bonus of reducing any frame flex due to the additional cross member. Otherwise all the stabilizer would have consisted of was another cross member.....AND they would have called it a frame brace instead of a steering box support. But I guess using your line of logic DSS just added the addition shaft support bearing to his new frame brace simply because it was close to the frame brace and looked good.....? Why not right?
Again, we can agree to disagree but clearly you would rather not while continually trying to beat everyone into submission and follow your theory that the SBB built by DSS was solely conjured up as a frame brace, not shaft deflection. Even especially when the SSI website lists the reasons for the steering box support as deflection first and frame issue second.
That said, I do agree that frame flex is always going to be a variable when a steering box is mounted to only one side of a frame.....especially when larger heavier M/T tires over that of stock sizes are part of the equation. But frame flex cannot attribute to sector shaft deflection alone as there are no additional stresses placed on the steering box when the frame is flexing. Rather the tires themselves having the ability to move left and right freely, and the joint movement of the drag link to pitman arm removes all that stress. But the load pressure transmitted back from the tires to the pitman arm as the steering box tries to turn them left and right is where the deflection comes from.
Also, frame flex transmitting back to the steering box can ONLY happen when the steering box brace is used as the shaft is now forced to move along with the twisting action of the frame which is now connected to the brace. So if all you have is SSI's website marketing sentence then I'm not sure I'd be so bold as to call that "overwhelming evidence". But feel free to run with it.
I am still trying to figure out what you are disagreeing with ??
Hopefully that above answers where my disagreement lays.
