The new age world has progressed regressed shifted (pun) to a point where the manual transmissions available, are unable to handle the input torque @ RPM in a package small enough to fit at a price point to make them viable, and still able to be shifted by humans who get less and less talented each fiscal birth year...
...at the same time automatic transmission "technology" is getting better. They are still full of magic voodoo to most people, even many professional mechanics, but less often are they coming apart for repairs in the average joe/jane applications.
These new trucks are, pretty much, double the hp and torque (or more) of the original ones. The little 6.7 ISB is putting out numbers some of the EatonFuller transmissions cannot handle at this point. Hence the detune...
If a buyer can drive a manual and enjoys it, they still have 660 'torques' at their disposal, which not but a decade ago scooted most everything along just dandy. I haven't researched it deeply but I'd reckon that 930 out of the HO engine is torque limited until a certain point, because after that "monster Aisin" is a little Spicer u-joint system feeding a light truck rear end. It's all a recipe for drivetrain disaster if one looks real close at it.
I'd take a manual trans truck personally, but I can drive one, so....
Fleets switch to autos due to wear and tear. No other reason.