How many of you that prefer the AAM 11. 5 factory differential have 4WD? My truck is 2WD and has been stuck in soft sand and mud. A vehicle with poor weight distribution, poor suspension geometry, and springs that are too hard to absorb any shock from quickly applied torque will get stuck in the silliest places. This could be avoided with a clutch style differential.
AAM says to use the emergency brake to get the left rear tire to drive. Some of you have suggested this. I have tried it. Please take a minute to consider the logic behind this. For this to work, the right rear emergency brake has to engage before the left rear. Otherwise the right rear continues to drive and bury itself. Of course the e-brake is intended to apply equal pressure to left and rear. If this works, it is coincidence and not design. A separate lever to apply pressure to only the right rear e-brake may correct this.
If the truck is moving and the right rear breaks loose, the left rear will then takeover and break loose. By then I have let off the throttle. This happens on wet pavement quite a bit. I would trade this for both tires driving from a dead stop. AAM has admitted that both rear wheels need to be turning at a slow rate for its differential to work as they intend. That can't happen when stuck in mud or sand.
This AAM 11. 5" differential cannot be an inexpensive piece. The benefit is so low that Chrysler could have just as well used an open differential in my truck.