I hear ya Scott. I've been looking at the adapters from
http://www.chromewheel.com/dominator.htm and then going with conventional 10 bolt alcoas or something. The thing is I don't know if there are a lot of nice options for SRW rigs like ours. I need to do more investigating. Also, I don't know how the offset issue (i. e. net final offset with the adapter and wheel combo) will calculate using generic 10 bold 19. 5" wheels with the adapter. I do like the idea of going with conventional and not proprietary wheels... .
They also push the idea of the 22. 5" wheels too:
"4X4 Single Wheel Mini Float 22. 5
This by far is the Crème Della Crème of the single wheel application. The Alcoa 893631 22. 5x9. 0 wheel is designed for loads up to 9000# each the adaptor system is tested to 10,000 each and most tires suitable for the use on 4x4’s has maximum loading capability of 6000# each and upwards.
Tire and wheel failures are non-existent unless something incredible is introduced, The use of the superior tires as the Michelin 255/70x22. 5 XD2 can give estimated tire wear near 300,000 with periodic rotation and truck suspension maintenance. This size is suitable for most 4x4’s that have no lift assist with the exception of a leveling kit in the front end to allowing for the additional weight of the diesel engine, usually require a mild suspension lift of approximately 4 inches or a maximum adjustment of the torsion bars for adequate tire clearance.
It is recommended that Superior Shocks be used when using larger tires and wheel assemblies. The ratio at the axle of tire wheel versus truck mass has changed significantly and standard hydraulic shock absorbers will become overworked on extended drives and fail to provide the ride comfort necessary. Nitrous Gas shocks seem to be the best answer for this application. "
Now running 255/70x22. 5's will give you some interesting dimensions:
Width 10. 04" (255. 00mm)
Sidewall Height 7. 03" (178. 50mm)
Overall Height 36. 06" (915. 80mm)
Circumference 113. 27" (2877. 07mm)
The width is narrower than our 265/70x17's. The 36 vs the 31. 4 overall height is pretty drastic and will really result in some serious final drive ratio changes..... Basically 2250 rpm's become 1972 rpm's at the same speed. A 3. 73 rear becomes a 3. 27. Music to my ears... .
I just have to wonder about clearance and offset.....
Then there's the 19. 5 option that's a little less radical of course.
285/70x19. 5's are around 35" overall height. 2250 rpm's become 2048 & a 3. 73 rear becomes a 3. 40... Probably a little more sane than the 22. 5 option... .
Just wonder about the offset issue and whether they'll stick out a lot. It's hard to get specific answers on some of this stuff.....