Barry, it's more an issue of how steady that torque is than how much you have.
Here are the three common-rail engines of 2003 and 2004:
235-250/460 SO:
- peak torque - 460 lb-ft @ 1400 rpm
- hp-peak - 457 lb-ft @ 2700 rpm (235)
- hp-peak - 453 lb-ft @ 2900 rpm (250)
305/555 HO:
- peak torque - 555 lb-ft @ 1400 rpm
- hp-peak - 552 lb-ft @ 2900 rpm
325/600
- peak torque - 600 lb-ft @ 1600 rpm
- hp-peak - 588 lb-ft @ 2900 rpm
Now, compare that to the Cummins uprate kit on a 12-valve:
230/605
- peak torque - 605 lb-ft @ 1600 rpm
- hp-peak - 447 lb-ft @ 2700 rpm
The common-rail engines keep their torque through the entire powerband (losing no more than a miniscule 2%), while the uprate kit loses a whopping 25% over the rev range.