gonzo2 said:It seems to me (just by casual observation) that the later 04. 5's have less trucks with mileage issues than the early ones. Does this seem correct?
We give the Dodge boys a lot of grief on this site, but personally I am always impressed with all the work they put into improving our trucks while trying to keep ahead of the EPA and acountants.
BTW I drove a 600 last weekend and it did feel slightly stronger by the seat of my pants.
GFritsch said:The comparison was made between the 04 305/555 and the 325/600 engines (Reread the first two posts) I stand by my statement the that trucks are more similar than different. My second statement is proven by the posts that follow.
PBJohnson2 said:The kid, Po' Riggity comes on and says Im full of crap, then continues to post similar posts. I think this thread needs to be closed.
Po' Riggity said:Im done with you. I don't see how my two posts were similar, and thanks for the kid compliment BTW.
Scott
PBJohnson2 said:Your stats show you to be born in 1980. . That is a kid in my book. Your replys and slams confirm your age :-laf
Im sick of kids coming on line, still wet behind the ears, talking about nothing that they know anything about and then saying that other people are full of crap.
Well, I accept your apoligy![]()
DPelletier said:The 2004 HO truck has the 305/555 ETH engine. The 2004. 5 had a mid-year release of the new 325/600 ETH engine which was necessary to meet the January 2004 emmissions regulations. They also discontinued the ETC Standard Output engine.
The new engine has several changes, including the radiator shroud, intercooler, exhaust valves, turbo housing, ECM and has a post injection event as well as a catalytic converter.
Dave