No doubt but it shows DC is moving in that direction.
Not necessarily.
Chrysler's goal may be fuel economy with a transmission not intended for the HD trucks.
BTW, the Daimler in your "DC" abbreviation has been gone for several years now.
No doubt but it shows DC is moving in that direction.
Looks like you have a similar setup what kind of mileage are you getting towing?
What is your combined wt?
I have the 350/650 Cummins (plenty of power for my purposes) and 4. 10 gears. That notwithstanding, our MS has a 16,000 lb GVWR, and we get around 10. 2 MPG @ 65 MPH on the Interstate when towing and 16-17 MPG unloaded @ 75 MPH. Not much different from our previous 2002 ETH/DEE dually with 4. 10s, other than the 2011 is turning 1612 RPM @ 60 MPH versus 2000 RPM @ 60 MPH for the 2002.
Rusty
I've explained here in these pages probably 100 times.
The controllers that tap into hydraulic line pressure feel precisely what the driver calls for with his right foot. The trailer brakes will respond precisely as the truck's brakes do, no delays, no surges, no weak or excessively strong brake application.
With a real brake controller you will soon forget about trailer braking. The truck and trailer will slow or STOP exactly as you direct with your right foot. No surprises, no disappointments.
Some members are apparently "unfamiliar" with the word SEARCH or how the function can be performed on most forums.
I've explained here in these pages probably 100 times.
The controllers that tap into hydraulic line pressure feel precisely what the driver calls for with his right foot. The trailer brakes will respond precisely as the truck's brakes do, no delays, no surges, no weak or excessively strong brake application.
With a real brake controller you will soon forget about trailer braking. The truck and trailer will slow or STOP exactly as you direct with your right foot. No surprises, no disappointments.