Here I am

2nd Gen Non-Engine/Transmission After 3.54 to 4.10 conversion

Attention: TDR Forum Junkies
To the point: Click this link and check out the Front Page News story(ies) where we are tracking the introduction of the 2025 Ram HD trucks.

Thanks, TDR Staff

Engine/Transmission (1998.5 - 2002) Time for a new turbo? Options?

Engine/Transmission (1998.5 - 2002) Pusher Pump Kits

Status
Not open for further replies.
I brought my rig to work this morning. I'm still running 55 mph (like before) but the boost and exhaust gas temps are both down quite a bite. Obviously, the truck is more responsive and when I'm all locked up at 55 I'm thinking "I haven't shifted into o. d. yet". But I have. The higher rpms will take some getting used to. I hope that Josh (my partner in this swap) is as happy with his truck as I am mine. I do realize that I'm somewhat of an oddity, because I can just sit in the slow lane and watch the world "fly" by. I was getting 16 average on my rig before on a long trip with my 10'6" cab over, It will be interesting to see the improvement (I hope) in fuel mileage.
 
I went the other way & picked up a solid 1. 5 mpg empty. My TT towing mileage was not affected at all, but I have a 5 speed, 33" tall tire & SRW
 
Bart said:
I brought my rig to work this morning. I'm still running 55 mph (like before) but the boost and exhaust gas temps are both down quite a bite. Obviously, the truck is more responsive and when I'm all locked up at 55 I'm thinking "I haven't shifted into o. d. yet". But I have. The higher rpms will take some getting used to. I hope that Josh (my partner in this swap) is as happy with his truck as I am mine. I do realize that I'm somewhat of an oddity, because I can just sit in the slow lane and watch the world "fly" by. I was getting 16 average on my rig before on a long trip with my 10'6" cab over, It will be interesting to see the improvement (I hope) in fuel mileage.

I almost went 4. 10's but settled for 3. 73's from stock 3. 54's. With my camper and 285's and mods it's a good compromise. If I went to 35's,4. 10's would be the way to go. If you go to an "E" rated Toyo 285 or BFG it might be a perfect combo.
 
don't count on a mileage increase. It'd be more likely to see a decrease with the lower axle gears (given the same size tires), but you'll have more fun driving your rig and towing :D
 
Increase ? Maybe, Maybe not!

If you drive at 55 or 60 your RPM was to low with the 3. 54.

I run a little faster, but if I stay at 60 mph, I'm at 600 degree's and turning 2000rpm.

Of course I am running stock 215/85/16 tires.

With 35's your RPM may still be alittle low.

Just my thoughts.

Scott
 
I just went from 4. 10 to 3. 54. Empty running 75mph I got 22mpg going down I-5 from Sacramento to San Diego. The same trip with the 4. 10s I got 18 if I was lucky. Now I can get 700 miles in a tank of fuel. My only issue is that I have the 5 speed, I have to be careful of the going too slow in fifth and causing problems with the fifth gear nut.
 
Brake specific horsepower

Tdr has a few older articles about Brake specific horsepower.

24v is most efficient at 2000rpms as far as power per amount of fuel.

12 valve was a few hundred lower.
 
The RPMs at which the motor is most efficient does not necessarily translate into the speed at which the vehicle gets the best MPG. Many other factors involved with MPG; most obvious is wind resistance at higher speeds.
 
Sounds like I will be geting some 4:10's for my truck once I put in a new coverter and trans I think I'll need the extra grunt since my truck has 35 bf's on it
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top