Here I am

Engine/Transmission (1998.5 - 2002) airdog vs. fass...

Attention: TDR Forum Junkies
To the point: Click this link and check out the Front Page News story(ies) where we are tracking the introduction of the 2025 Ram HD trucks.

Thanks, TDR Staff

Engine/Transmission (1998.5 - 2002) 02 Turbo up-grade question

Engine/Transmission (1998.5 - 2002) Help Lift pump problems

Status
Not open for further replies.
can't decide which one to go with. Seems a lot of folks have gone with the fass here. Besides the price, what are the negatives of the airdog?
 
My Airdog has been flawless. It's quieter then the FASS (I believe) but I think it just comes down to personal preferance. I wont get any flames going here but you can read many a thread on FASS vs Airdog... Airdog is made by the Father, FASS by the son who set out on his own. The sega starts there...
 
Other than price, I don't think there are any negatives associated with the AirDog compared to the FASS. They are very similar functionally and I believe use the same motor.



Both are kind of pricey for what they are, and even though I don't regret my FASS (flawless over the last 2 years), I'll probably home-brew the next time I have to do something like this.
 
THenningsen,



I have had my AirDog on for 140,000 miles and have had zero issues. I will not say AirDog is perfect, but at the same time I have not personally known of one to fail.



Having installed both FASS & AirDog I can say there is a big difference in how the two units are designed and manufactured. AirDog wins there easily. Also, the AirDog was designed to work with the factory fuel tank suction tube while some FASS units have had issues on this point.



To me the AirDog wins hands down no matter what aspect you consider.



PM me for the name of a dealer. I make zero dollars from any sales.



Godspeed,

Trent
 
Model numbers have changed recently. I have an FP-80 and there was an FP-80HP for highly modified fuel requirements at 500 HP or more.



I thought the originals were rated at 85GPH at working load. However: I've seen sites selling the new model number FP-100 with data spec's at 100 to 110 GPH.



When Larry Crawford was around we could just call and ask but, now that Kenny is the only one left the poor guy is on overload and getting a call into or back from him takes time.



I work in the 'pump' business (industrial liquids) and when a person looks at any pump the spec's may be misleading. Some manufacturers spec 'free-flow' volume and others spec 'working-load' at a given PSI level.



I have free flowed my AirDog into a five gallon bucket and the given volume is extremely healthy and most likely more than we need at many different horse power levels.



William
 
The new FASS pumps are a lot quieter with the new motor plus they have a 4year warranty. They come with all hose and fittings to install a harness and relay. Including factory type suction hook up to the tank a lot nicer then 2 years ago. FASS now has a 3micron filter good idea for 3gens they come in 95gph 150gph and 200gph
 
And this is my point. . I can only suspect the reason the 150Gph Fass unit has had problems pulling fuel through the stock fuel pickup is because it is pulling more fuel than most others.

Is 150gph overkill? Probably. Are 1/2 inch fuel lines overkill? Probably. Is a 1/2 inch fuel pickup from the bottom of the tank overkill? Probably. But of course, none of us engage in overkill when it comes to our cummins diesels. And having no more than 2 psi of fuel variance maximum from no load to 450 HP (or way more in some cases) is probably overkill also.

Until the stock pickup tube has been replaced, the fuel system is still flawed no matter what pump you go with. It is a pos and has probably contributed to the failures of lots of oem pumps.

Added: I ended up using a 1/2" copper pipe soldered to a bulkhead fitting for my new pickup tube. About a month afterwards, Eric at Vulcan Products started selling his 1/2" Draw Straw kit. It looks alot easier to install and a better fix than what I went with, so to be helpful I recommend looking at his kit or anyone elses that is similar.
 
Last edited:
Ok, now you guys got me thinking again. . :rolleyes:

I would be curious to know how the OEMs or 70 dollar lift pumps are holding up with the 1/2 inch fuel pickup tube conversions. . I bet a setup like Gary's (using a low pressure pusher pump feeding a standard carter lift pump) with very little input restriction would work out pretty decent, and be easy to r&r if needed.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top