Here I am

Another SPS66 towing opinion...

Attention: TDR Forum Junkies
To the point: Click this link and check out the Front Page News story(ies) where we are tracking the introduction of the 2025 Ram HD trucks.

Thanks, TDR Staff

Confirming what we already knew...

White smoke at startup

Status
Not open for further replies.

JStieger

TDR MEMBER
After reading posts about surging and big turbos for towing I figured that I would post my observations...



I just came back from a 700 mile towing trip to Reno-Carson City and back to Elko to test out my new-used car trailer. The route involved 550 miles of 70-75 mph I80 (2 "big pulls" w/ Emigrant and Golconda Summits) with 50 miles city and the remaining on US#395 (55 to 0 to 70 to 0 mph etc. ) to visit RankRam.



I figured I was at ~15,000 lbs total, with the windcatcher windshield up on my jeep, spare jeep/truck parts, etc. . My trailer is surprisingly heavy for a car trailer in that the trailer empty combined with the switch to winter diesel cost me about 1. 5 mpg (Yes, I drove with my empty trailer for 1/2 tank just to see!). I towed with the 100 HP injectors, TST 1x0 for timing only, 25% on the MP-8, which should put me at about 400-425 RWHP based on my previous dynos. These are my results with the SPS66 turbo:



->Flat cruise at 75 mph: 8 psi boost, 850* EGT

->Rolling hill at 75 mph: 10-12 psi boost, 900*-925* EGT

->Easy part of above summits 75 mph: 20 psi boost, 1000* EGT

->Steep part of above summits 75 mph: 25-30 psi boost, 1050* EGT

->overall mileage = 12. 8 mpg (I hate winter fuel!)



I finally noticed turbo surge 3 times during this trip and now that I know what it is I know for sure that I also experienced it once empty 2 weeks ago. These were the surge conditions:



1) 1X empty and 2X towing: interstate on-ramp when someone in front of me slowed down, but I was too lazy too downshift at about 1300 rpm and I had to feather the throttle. If I more than feathered the throttle then no surge.

2) 1X steady cruise on US#395 and some dude cut in front of me and slowed down to where I got in between 5th and 6th gear normally, but decided to stay in 6th - again having to feather the throttle.



I think in terms of the surging, the performance cam probably brings the surge rpm lower since the engine is allowed to breathe easier and consume the air the turbo is generating. In my case the rpm is in the lugging range anyway for all intents-and-purposes. That is, I should have downshifted to have the power to get out of these situations anyway in terms of good defensive driving. Also, the surging did not produce any fluttering in the boost gauge as others have reported. This is interesting as the only surge sympton I had was a real faint chaw-chaw-chaw sound like the sled pullers make at the end of a pull, but a heck of a lot quieter. I did have to turn the stereo down to hear this sound; otherwise it was so quiet and could be mistaken for road noise.



Some other things I noticed:



->With 100 HP injectors the truck does throw continuous slight black smoke until fully up to operating temp. I think if I would have turned the fuel pressure (MP8) down this would have helped.

->I tried a couple of times turning the TST up to level 2, but it just fuels too hard when towing with my mods. Basically goes like this: clear-black-clear black-clear-black through every shift

->Almost every stop I started in 1st gear, which ticked a lot of the Christmas shoppers off, but they sure get surprised when they think they can wing around me by the time I am in 3rd - especially with how fast this turbo spools when it hits 10 psi.

->driving on US#395 with the sudden speed changes wasn't too bad even if I kept it in 6th. As long as I rolled into the throttle rather than feathering it, the turbo did fine.

->in the 20-30 psi boost range the EGT basically just sat at ~1000*. Extrapolating out that would be ~1200*EGT at ~40 psi ~400-425 RWHP.

->I don't know if I would want to tow at any higher power levels than what I did. It was more than enough to pass anyone on the hills with power to spare to get me into trouble if I dared. Further, in the previous point the EGT were still in check at the power level I ran at.



What's the verdict?



1) So far the turbo hasn't disappointed me. I need to tow a heavier load to fully see how it does. Anyone have a trailer they will let me borrow? :-laf

2) However, the surge thing intrigues me. The cam probably dropped the surge rpm into lugging territory anyway so I think the lack of a cam upgrade would definitely make me want to switch back to a smaller turbo. I'll see how it goes over the next 6 months or so. I know that if I did go back to a 62 mm, I would hate it empty on the back roads because I couldn't stay in the throttle as much. There is no icing on this cake!



Here's my rig from this morning:
 
Good post.



I just replaced my sps 66 with another 66 since I was having a ton of surging problems. The new 66 works a lot better than the original turbo.



Last night, pulling my horse trailer and horses (about 10k lbs. ) I too had minor surging while rolling on the throttle in 6th gear climbing various small typical southern California mountains out of the SF Valley (going from sea level to about 3000).



I probably should have been in 5th but too lazy to shift down. The Hy35 used to handle the grunt probably better way down low without the surge.



But on a positive note, other than the 2 times of surging, it was making a ton of boost and the EGT's never got over 1100 with the hot juice on 2, and EZ pressure box on 3.



So far, very happy with the results. Just need to learn not to roll on the throttle on steep hills in 6th. .
 
hasselbach



Did you get a new SPS66 with a different configuration or just a same for same replacement? Is the woof-woof any better or different??
 
I have been running a htb2 sp66 for about a week now with no problems. With the auto transmission I may not get any surging. This seems to be a great turbo for the third gens. making over 500 hp.
 
So are all you recent owners of the SPS66 on the 3gen motors running no more then 40psi?



What are the the limits of this turbo in theory/practice with just a set of studs holding the stock gasket in place?



This is looking more and more like my future turbo when my truck hits 100,000 miles. Or I run into $$$ to get studs, injectors and the turbo. Figure, this would be the only way to install this kinda upgrade. :)
 
JVolpe said:
hasselbach



Did you get a new SPS66 with a different configuration or just a same for same replacement? Is the woof-woof any better or different??



From what I can see, its the same exact turbo I had before, but this one works a tad better :-laf



You have to love the exhaust note on these trucks with this turbo. It really sounds like a jet engine outside. I find myself rolling the right window down when I am driving along sound walls on the freeway :D
 
Last edited:
JasonCzerak said:
So are all you recent owners of the SPS66 on the 3gen motors running no more then 40psi?



What are the the limits of this turbo in theory/practice with just a set of studs holding the stock gasket in place?



This is looking more and more like my future turbo when my truck hits 100,000 miles. Or I run into $$$ to get studs, injectors and the turbo. Figure, this would be the only way to install this kinda upgrade. :)

Actually, the turbo works great with the box off. Spools almost just as quick, and goes to 36 psi a lot quicker than the Hy35 (only got 32 in stock form).



When you put some juice to it, the boost needle will snap well past 40 psi, much quicker than the stock unit. I haven't put all the fuel to it due to a slipping clutch, but when I was in Brett's truck, when he matted the throttle at idle, I saw the boost go well past 55 psi in a nano second (no throttle braking). Granted he has a strong TST (I think on 5/4 that day) and level 3's. Truely awesome how fast and hard it pulled.
 
JasonCzerak said:
So are all you recent owners of the SPS66 on the 3gen motors running no more then 40psi?



I have my wastegate set at 40 psi and I replaced the adjustable boost elbow with a regular full flow one. Without measuring temperatures I just figure anything more than 40 psi is getting into really hot air.



With my mods if I romp on the throttle with the TST turned up, the turbo is already at 40 psi with the wastegate full open when the boost is at 30-35 psi! It kind of shows how much the stock intercooler sucks for flow/pressure drop. When I did my 503 HP dyno, the wastegate was set at 40 psi, but the turbo drive pressure spike as measured by my SPA gauge was 50 psi!
 
My wastegate is set at 55psi. Stock head bolts so far.



I normally have the boxes set about 100hp over stock and the SPS66 spools and works fine for daily driving. Needless to say it is laggy to about 12psi compared to stock turbo. Learning how to roll into throttle to compensate took a little while, but I think I have the hang of it now. The EZ on level 1 seems to mitigate most of the low end lag. The turbo does spool ok for me, daily driving. I rarely see over 30psi daily driving. On the track I can keep the wastegate open at 55psi most of the 1/4 mile.



I still bark it sometimes and that is my only complaint with the turbo. As long as it does not detonate because of the barking I really don't mind.
 
The ATS manifold seems to make the truck sound different in my application too. Can't tell if the replacement turbo, or the ATS manifold was the ticket, but the flow design on the ATS is vastly superior to the stock unit on runners 4 and 5.



I have almost no lag at all, so maybe the more efficient design is helping with the spool up.
 
I understand these head gaskets are overkill for stock. I'm just curious where the limit is on boost and if I'll even need studs. Or should I just do them and forget about it. And naturaly the limit of the turbo's efficienty.



You guys are really holding 55psi and nothing's blowing up? That's cool and kinda of a good piece of mind to have.



This is truck is daily empty cruiser that does light work here and there. But it's mainly to just have fun with on my way to work and stuff.



My ultimate goal to hopefully _STOP_ at is 550hp at the wheels and a clutch that holds that and tires that don't widdle away to easly :) Naturally this turbo will be a big piece of the puzzle.
 
Last edited:
Mine holds 46psi at wot. I'm running stock injectors and it may go up a litte more after I change them. It takes timing to spool a turbo and these trucks don't have much. I hope some one will come out with a way to change the timing in cab for these trucks. Retarded for cold starts and flip a switch to advance after warm up. With the VA3. 1 on 100% this turbo spools quite well. I don't think we have to worry about stock head bolts till we can advance the timing more.
 
Well 55psi is my limit with stock head bolts. I probably wont see it again. Done with track for the year. As soon as I can afford next year I want to add studs, injectors and if possible a modded cp3 and then start over with boxes and tuning to see what happens.



I have seen 55psi at the track at least 25 times or so without nuking anything. Maybe just lucky, and I am not gonna push it any farther.
 
WCounts said:
Mine holds 46psi at wot. I'm running stock injectors and it may go up a litte more after I change them. It takes timing to spool a turbo and these trucks don't have much. I hope some one will come out with a way to change the timing in cab for these trucks. Retarded for cold starts and flip a switch to advance after warm up. With the VA3. 1 on 100% this turbo spools quite well. I don't think we have to worry about stock head bolts till we can advance the timing more.

NOt sure what you're trying to say, but in general, more timing= more lag.

You want fast spoolup, RETARD the timing.

jh
 
Hohn said:
NOt sure what you're trying to say, but in general, more timing= more lag.



You want fast spoolup, RETARD the timing.



jh

Please explain this in further, not sure how this could happen. Is it possibly due to later injection causes higher EGT's?
 
The factory retards the timing for emissions. 'Less smoke' at the cost of higher egts and fuel economy. They do start better in cold weather with retarded timing. If we could advance the timing on the third gen it would make the power and get better fuel economy. Timing will spool a turbo.
 
I'm going to give Industrial Injection a call Tuesday and see if I can get my SPS 66 swapped to the SP 62 this Friday - either straight swap or replacing the compressor and compressor housing.



I thought long and hard about this the past 2 days and I think for what I use my truck for the SP 62 is the better choice. I don't sled pull or drag race, but do pull a car trailer from time to time and want to have fun at the stoplights without worrying about smoking people out unintentionally. That would be cool for stealth purposes :cool: .



I know, I know... I had a good HTB2 62/14 before this one... but I just couldn't help myself! :D When I had the 62/14 the cam really made the low rpm range really fun in terms of "pullability" and now with the 66/14 I feel that I lost some of this fun factor in terms of having to watch throttle position all the time to prevent the surge.



I noticed this morning while towing the empty trailer back to my storage place my truck smoked a haze 100% of the time due to the very low boost levels at cruise. That can't be good for fuel economy. However, once you get going up in rpms this turbo shines. In the states with +70 mph speed limits this turbo would be great since rpm is +1900 rpm, but I think if one was in CA or OR with slower speed limits it might be a different story.
 
Last edited:
The 62/14 is a great turbo for up to 500hp. I ran one for a year at 485hp every day. It started as a 62/12 and I changed the turbine housing to a 14cm. If I wasn't going over 500hp and did a lot of towing the 62 can't be beat. Over 500hp I like the 66. With my auto transmission I don't have a surge problem. The 66 so far is a great match for my truck. I can make it surge on purpose by locking the t/c and lugging the motor. I tow on tst 3/3 and va off. Well changing turbos is not a bad job. Have fun.
 
Jeff_K said:
Julius, what about a 66/12 ? Or will that still get too hot?



I'm going to go with the 62. The 66 makes a lot of air at low rpms that my engine can't consume. The 12 housing would probably make it spool faster and make even more air that the engine can't consume and further drive me crazy. I don't know if the shaft in the turbo would even be balanced anymore with the different wheel sizes on each end?



I felt that I've negated all effects of having my cam that I enjoyed so much when I had a 62. It used to feel like driving a CAT powered rig; now it's like driving a Detroit powered rig. I also figure that the 62 will give me more options for the future - as in twins! :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top