I have some older trucks and cars with R-12 a/c systems that mostly work, but they are getting low over the years. The two I am concerned with charging or retrofitting right now are a '73 Camaro and an '81 Chevy pickup.
After surfing the 'net and doing a fair amount of reading on the subject, plus my personal not-so-satisfied results with doing an R-12 to R134a conversion on a previous vehicle, the only thing that is clear to me is that there have been so many mixed results with doing conversions and so many "substitute" refrigerants making all kinds of claims that I am heavily inclined to simply stay with the R-12 the vehicles were designed for. Obtaining the R-12 is not an major issue for me. The cost is higher but, done right, should be more-or-less a one time thing, and is worth it to me to have an effective, reliable system.
The '73 Camaro uses the big, long, heavy style compressor and we would like to switch to the smaller compressor like what the '81 Chevy pickup has. More for engine compartment asthetics and the desire to switch to a serpentine belt system than anything else. The Camaro's a/c still worked last summer, but wasn't all that cold. Still pretty impressive given it's age, though.
The '81 pickup, as mentioned, uses the smaller compressor, and still had some charge in the system when I bought it a few months ago (and has some even now), but not enough to turn on. (Why is that everyone who pops the hood on that truck feels so compelled to depress my low-side shrader valve to "check the charge"? In this case, 'everyone' amounts to two different guys who kinda po'ed me when they did that.
I gotta get a new cap for that valve so I can slow such people down enough to stop them... )
So, without digressing into an argument of legal or so-called environmental deadends that I couldn't care less about, I would like to know if there is any purely functional compelling reasons to undertake the task of converting the systems to something else and what exactly is involved and recommended? As I said, I once did an r-134a conversion and had less than stellar results and I'm not much interested in doing that particular one again.
I would also like to know if simply recharging the systems, perhaps with some type of stop-leak in the R-12, would be the best 1st thing to try. The fact that these vehicles have 30 and 38 year old systems that actually work and/or hold some significant charge makes me think they are still good systems I should leave them alone and just recharge them. Any good reasons not to?
After surfing the 'net and doing a fair amount of reading on the subject, plus my personal not-so-satisfied results with doing an R-12 to R134a conversion on a previous vehicle, the only thing that is clear to me is that there have been so many mixed results with doing conversions and so many "substitute" refrigerants making all kinds of claims that I am heavily inclined to simply stay with the R-12 the vehicles were designed for. Obtaining the R-12 is not an major issue for me. The cost is higher but, done right, should be more-or-less a one time thing, and is worth it to me to have an effective, reliable system.
The '73 Camaro uses the big, long, heavy style compressor and we would like to switch to the smaller compressor like what the '81 Chevy pickup has. More for engine compartment asthetics and the desire to switch to a serpentine belt system than anything else. The Camaro's a/c still worked last summer, but wasn't all that cold. Still pretty impressive given it's age, though.
The '81 pickup, as mentioned, uses the smaller compressor, and still had some charge in the system when I bought it a few months ago (and has some even now), but not enough to turn on. (Why is that everyone who pops the hood on that truck feels so compelled to depress my low-side shrader valve to "check the charge"? In this case, 'everyone' amounts to two different guys who kinda po'ed me when they did that.

So, without digressing into an argument of legal or so-called environmental deadends that I couldn't care less about, I would like to know if there is any purely functional compelling reasons to undertake the task of converting the systems to something else and what exactly is involved and recommended? As I said, I once did an r-134a conversion and had less than stellar results and I'm not much interested in doing that particular one again.
I would also like to know if simply recharging the systems, perhaps with some type of stop-leak in the R-12, would be the best 1st thing to try. The fact that these vehicles have 30 and 38 year old systems that actually work and/or hold some significant charge makes me think they are still good systems I should leave them alone and just recharge them. Any good reasons not to?
Last edited: